Abstract
Highlights
• International CIDP registries were compared to assess infrastructure and collected clinical data, diagnostic data and biomaterials to enhance future research and improve standards of care in CIDP.
• Consensus was reached on inclusion criteria, a core set of variables at baseline, follow-up frequency, a minimal outcome set during follow-up, standardising the collection of biomaterials and ownership of data and biomaterials.
• Task force was formed to harmonize the current registry protocols and develop INCbase as a central database.
• International CIDP registries were compared to assess infrastructure and collected clinical data, diagnostic data and biomaterials to enhance future research and improve standards of care in CIDP.
• Consensus was reached on inclusion criteria, a core set of variables at baseline, follow-up frequency, a minimal outcome set during follow-up, standardising the collection of biomaterials and ownership of data and biomaterials.
• Task force was formed to harmonize the current registry protocols and develop INCbase as a central database.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 178-184 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Neuromuscular Disorders |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '231st ENMC International Workshop: International Standard for CIDP Registry and Biobank, Naarden, The Netherlands, 12–14 May 2017'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver