A comparison of two distributed large-volume measurement systems: the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system and the indoor global positioning system

D.A. Maisano, J. Jamshidi*, F. Franceschini, P.G. Maropoulos, L. Mastrogiacomo, A.R. Mileham, G.W. Owen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Advances in the area of industrial metrology have generated new technologies that are capable of measuring components with complex geometry and large dimensions. However, no standard or best-practice guides are available for the majority of such systems. Therefore, these new systems require appropriate testing and verification in order for the users to understand their full potential prior to their deployment in a real manufacturing environment. This is a crucial stage, especially when more than one system can be used for a specific measurement task. In this paper, two relatively new large-volume measurement systems, the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system (MScMS) and the indoor global positioning system (iGPS), are reviewed. These two systems utilize different technologies: the MScMS is based on ultrasound and radiofrequency signal transmission and the iGPS uses laser technology. Both systems have components with small dimensions that are distributed around the measuring area to form a network of sensors allowing rapid dimensional measurements to be performed in relation to large-size objects, with typical dimensions of several decametres. The portability, reconfigurability, and ease of installation make these systems attractive for many industries that manufacture large-scale products. In this paper, the major technical aspects of the two systems are briefly described and compared. Initial results of the tests performed to establish the repeatability and reproducibility of these systems are also presented.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)511-521
    Number of pages11
    JournalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
    Volume223
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2009
    Event4th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology - University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Duration: 19 Sep 200721 Sep 2007

    Fingerprint

    Volume measurement
    Global positioning system
    Ultrasonics
    Geometry
    Lasers
    Sensors
    Testing
    Industry

    Keywords

    • dimensional measurement
    • distance measurements
    • indoor GPS
    • large-scale metrology
    • metrological performance
    • mobile measuring system

    Cite this

    @article{4c76e2101d20415a9993cd38e10d29a2,
    title = "A comparison of two distributed large-volume measurement systems: the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system and the indoor global positioning system",
    abstract = "Advances in the area of industrial metrology have generated new technologies that are capable of measuring components with complex geometry and large dimensions. However, no standard or best-practice guides are available for the majority of such systems. Therefore, these new systems require appropriate testing and verification in order for the users to understand their full potential prior to their deployment in a real manufacturing environment. This is a crucial stage, especially when more than one system can be used for a specific measurement task. In this paper, two relatively new large-volume measurement systems, the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system (MScMS) and the indoor global positioning system (iGPS), are reviewed. These two systems utilize different technologies: the MScMS is based on ultrasound and radiofrequency signal transmission and the iGPS uses laser technology. Both systems have components with small dimensions that are distributed around the measuring area to form a network of sensors allowing rapid dimensional measurements to be performed in relation to large-size objects, with typical dimensions of several decametres. The portability, reconfigurability, and ease of installation make these systems attractive for many industries that manufacture large-scale products. In this paper, the major technical aspects of the two systems are briefly described and compared. Initial results of the tests performed to establish the repeatability and reproducibility of these systems are also presented.",
    keywords = "dimensional measurement, distance measurements, indoor GPS, large-scale metrology, metrological performance, mobile measuring system",
    author = "D.A. Maisano and J. Jamshidi and F. Franceschini and P.G. Maropoulos and L. Mastrogiacomo and A.R. Mileham and G.W. Owen",
    year = "2009",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1243/09544054JEM1271",
    language = "English",
    volume = "223",
    pages = "511--521",
    journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture",
    issn = "0954-4054",
    publisher = "SAGE",
    number = "5",

    }

    A comparison of two distributed large-volume measurement systems : the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system and the indoor global positioning system. / Maisano, D.A.; Jamshidi, J.; Franceschini, F.; Maropoulos, P.G.; Mastrogiacomo, L.; Mileham, A.R.; Owen, G.W.

    In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 223, No. 5, 01.05.2009, p. 511-521.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A comparison of two distributed large-volume measurement systems

    T2 - the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system and the indoor global positioning system

    AU - Maisano, D.A.

    AU - Jamshidi, J.

    AU - Franceschini, F.

    AU - Maropoulos, P.G.

    AU - Mastrogiacomo, L.

    AU - Mileham, A.R.

    AU - Owen, G.W.

    PY - 2009/5/1

    Y1 - 2009/5/1

    N2 - Advances in the area of industrial metrology have generated new technologies that are capable of measuring components with complex geometry and large dimensions. However, no standard or best-practice guides are available for the majority of such systems. Therefore, these new systems require appropriate testing and verification in order for the users to understand their full potential prior to their deployment in a real manufacturing environment. This is a crucial stage, especially when more than one system can be used for a specific measurement task. In this paper, two relatively new large-volume measurement systems, the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system (MScMS) and the indoor global positioning system (iGPS), are reviewed. These two systems utilize different technologies: the MScMS is based on ultrasound and radiofrequency signal transmission and the iGPS uses laser technology. Both systems have components with small dimensions that are distributed around the measuring area to form a network of sensors allowing rapid dimensional measurements to be performed in relation to large-size objects, with typical dimensions of several decametres. The portability, reconfigurability, and ease of installation make these systems attractive for many industries that manufacture large-scale products. In this paper, the major technical aspects of the two systems are briefly described and compared. Initial results of the tests performed to establish the repeatability and reproducibility of these systems are also presented.

    AB - Advances in the area of industrial metrology have generated new technologies that are capable of measuring components with complex geometry and large dimensions. However, no standard or best-practice guides are available for the majority of such systems. Therefore, these new systems require appropriate testing and verification in order for the users to understand their full potential prior to their deployment in a real manufacturing environment. This is a crucial stage, especially when more than one system can be used for a specific measurement task. In this paper, two relatively new large-volume measurement systems, the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system (MScMS) and the indoor global positioning system (iGPS), are reviewed. These two systems utilize different technologies: the MScMS is based on ultrasound and radiofrequency signal transmission and the iGPS uses laser technology. Both systems have components with small dimensions that are distributed around the measuring area to form a network of sensors allowing rapid dimensional measurements to be performed in relation to large-size objects, with typical dimensions of several decametres. The portability, reconfigurability, and ease of installation make these systems attractive for many industries that manufacture large-scale products. In this paper, the major technical aspects of the two systems are briefly described and compared. Initial results of the tests performed to establish the repeatability and reproducibility of these systems are also presented.

    KW - dimensional measurement

    KW - distance measurements

    KW - indoor GPS

    KW - large-scale metrology

    KW - metrological performance

    KW - mobile measuring system

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67449167738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://pib.sagepub.com/content/223/5/511

    U2 - 10.1243/09544054JEM1271

    DO - 10.1243/09544054JEM1271

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:67449167738

    VL - 223

    SP - 511

    EP - 521

    JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture

    JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture

    SN - 0954-4054

    IS - 5

    ER -