A critical reflection of current trends in discourse analytical research on leadership across disciplines. A call for a more engaging dialogue

Stephanie Schnurr, Andreas Schroeder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper takes the frequently lamented state of current leadership research in business and organisational sciences as a starting point and argues for a more open and engaging dialogue with leadership researchers in applied linguistics and pragmatics. Focusing on current debates around terminological issues and methodological questions that are particularly prominent in critical leadership studies, we show that research in applied linguistics and pragmatics has the potential to make important contributions by providing the analytical tools and processes to support critical leadership researchers in their quest to challenge hegemonic notions of leadership by moving beyond simplistic and often problematic leader-follower dichotomies and by providing empirical evidence to capture leadership in situ thereby feeding into current theorisations of leadership.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-460
Number of pages16
JournalLeadership
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date18 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

dialogue
leadership
discourse
trend
pragmatics
linguistics
follower
Discourse
Critical reflection
leader
science
evidence

Bibliographical note

© Sage 2018. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742715018767687

Keywords

  • Leadership discourse
  • applied linguistics
  • challenging hegemonic notions of leadership
  • critical leadership
  • leader–follower dichotomies
  • pragmatics

Cite this

@article{e109f3e2663e4035ae669da1586e6b34,
title = "A critical reflection of current trends in discourse analytical research on leadership across disciplines. A call for a more engaging dialogue",
abstract = "This paper takes the frequently lamented state of current leadership research in business and organisational sciences as a starting point and argues for a more open and engaging dialogue with leadership researchers in applied linguistics and pragmatics. Focusing on current debates around terminological issues and methodological questions that are particularly prominent in critical leadership studies, we show that research in applied linguistics and pragmatics has the potential to make important contributions by providing the analytical tools and processes to support critical leadership researchers in their quest to challenge hegemonic notions of leadership by moving beyond simplistic and often problematic leader-follower dichotomies and by providing empirical evidence to capture leadership in situ thereby feeding into current theorisations of leadership.",
keywords = "Leadership discourse, applied linguistics, challenging hegemonic notions of leadership, critical leadership, leader–follower dichotomies, pragmatics",
author = "Stephanie Schnurr and Andreas Schroeder",
note = "{\circledC} Sage 2018. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742715018767687",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1742715018767687",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "445--460",
number = "4",

}

A critical reflection of current trends in discourse analytical research on leadership across disciplines. A call for a more engaging dialogue. / Schnurr, Stephanie; Schroeder, Andreas.

In: Leadership, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.08.2019, p. 445-460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical reflection of current trends in discourse analytical research on leadership across disciplines. A call for a more engaging dialogue

AU - Schnurr, Stephanie

AU - Schroeder, Andreas

N1 - © Sage 2018. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742715018767687

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - This paper takes the frequently lamented state of current leadership research in business and organisational sciences as a starting point and argues for a more open and engaging dialogue with leadership researchers in applied linguistics and pragmatics. Focusing on current debates around terminological issues and methodological questions that are particularly prominent in critical leadership studies, we show that research in applied linguistics and pragmatics has the potential to make important contributions by providing the analytical tools and processes to support critical leadership researchers in their quest to challenge hegemonic notions of leadership by moving beyond simplistic and often problematic leader-follower dichotomies and by providing empirical evidence to capture leadership in situ thereby feeding into current theorisations of leadership.

AB - This paper takes the frequently lamented state of current leadership research in business and organisational sciences as a starting point and argues for a more open and engaging dialogue with leadership researchers in applied linguistics and pragmatics. Focusing on current debates around terminological issues and methodological questions that are particularly prominent in critical leadership studies, we show that research in applied linguistics and pragmatics has the potential to make important contributions by providing the analytical tools and processes to support critical leadership researchers in their quest to challenge hegemonic notions of leadership by moving beyond simplistic and often problematic leader-follower dichotomies and by providing empirical evidence to capture leadership in situ thereby feeding into current theorisations of leadership.

KW - Leadership discourse

KW - applied linguistics

KW - challenging hegemonic notions of leadership

KW - critical leadership

KW - leader–follower dichotomies

KW - pragmatics

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1742715018767687

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046681936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1742715018767687

DO - 10.1177/1742715018767687

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 445

EP - 460

IS - 4

ER -