A facial expression for anxiety

Adam M. Perkins, Sophie L. Inchley-Mort, Alan D. Pickering, Philip J. Corr, Adrian P. Burgess

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Anxiety and fear are often confounded in discussions of human emotions. However, studies of rodent defensive reactions under naturalistic conditions suggest anxiety is functionally distinct from fear. Unambiguous threats, such as predators, elicit flight from rodents (if an escape-route is available), whereas ambiguous threats (e.g., the odor of a predator) elicit risk assessment behavior, which is associated with anxiety as it is preferentially modulated by anti-anxiety drugs. However, without human evidence, it would be premature to assume that rodent-based psychological models are valid for humans. We tested the human validity of the risk assessment explanation for anxiety by presenting 8 volunteers with emotive scenarios and asking them to pose facial expressions. Photographs and videos of these expressions were shown to 40 participants who matched them to the scenarios and labeled each expression. Scenarios describing ambiguous threats were preferentially matched to the facial expression posed in response to the same scenario type. This expression consisted of two plausible environmental-scanning behaviors (eye darts and head swivels) and was labeled as anxiety, not fear. The facial expression elicited by unambiguous threat scenarios was labeled as fear. The emotion labels generated were then presented to another 18 participants who matched them back to photographs of the facial expressions. This back-matching of labels to faces also linked anxiety to the environmental-scanning face rather than fear face. Results therefore suggest that anxiety produces a distinct facial expression and that it has adaptive value in situations that are ambiguously threatening, supporting a functional, risk-assessing explanation for human anxiety.
LanguageEnglish
Pages910-924
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume102
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Facial Expression
facial expression
Anxiety
anxiety
Fear
Rodentia
scenario
Emotions
threat
Psychological Models
Anti-Anxiety Agents
risk assessment
Risk-Taking
emotion
Volunteers
Head
environmental behavior
flight

Cite this

Perkins, A. M., Inchley-Mort, S. L., Pickering, A. D., Corr, P. J., & Burgess, A. P. (2012). A facial expression for anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026825
Perkins, Adam M. ; Inchley-Mort, Sophie L. ; Pickering, Alan D. ; Corr, Philip J. ; Burgess, Adrian P. / A facial expression for anxiety. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 102, No. 5. pp. 910-924.
@article{cad3e69b667346b68a1627b382d16ee3,
title = "A facial expression for anxiety",
abstract = "Anxiety and fear are often confounded in discussions of human emotions. However, studies of rodent defensive reactions under naturalistic conditions suggest anxiety is functionally distinct from fear. Unambiguous threats, such as predators, elicit flight from rodents (if an escape-route is available), whereas ambiguous threats (e.g., the odor of a predator) elicit risk assessment behavior, which is associated with anxiety as it is preferentially modulated by anti-anxiety drugs. However, without human evidence, it would be premature to assume that rodent-based psychological models are valid for humans. We tested the human validity of the risk assessment explanation for anxiety by presenting 8 volunteers with emotive scenarios and asking them to pose facial expressions. Photographs and videos of these expressions were shown to 40 participants who matched them to the scenarios and labeled each expression. Scenarios describing ambiguous threats were preferentially matched to the facial expression posed in response to the same scenario type. This expression consisted of two plausible environmental-scanning behaviors (eye darts and head swivels) and was labeled as anxiety, not fear. The facial expression elicited by unambiguous threat scenarios was labeled as fear. The emotion labels generated were then presented to another 18 participants who matched them back to photographs of the facial expressions. This back-matching of labels to faces also linked anxiety to the environmental-scanning face rather than fear face. Results therefore suggest that anxiety produces a distinct facial expression and that it has adaptive value in situations that are ambiguously threatening, supporting a functional, risk-assessing explanation for human anxiety.",
author = "Perkins, {Adam M.} and Inchley-Mort, {Sophie L.} and Pickering, {Alan D.} and Corr, {Philip J.} and Burgess, {Adrian P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/a0026825",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "910--924",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Perkins, AM, Inchley-Mort, SL, Pickering, AD, Corr, PJ & Burgess, AP 2012, 'A facial expression for anxiety' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026825

A facial expression for anxiety. / Perkins, Adam M.; Inchley-Mort, Sophie L.; Pickering, Alan D.; Corr, Philip J.; Burgess, Adrian P.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 5, 05.2012, p. 910-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A facial expression for anxiety

AU - Perkins, Adam M.

AU - Inchley-Mort, Sophie L.

AU - Pickering, Alan D.

AU - Corr, Philip J.

AU - Burgess, Adrian P.

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Anxiety and fear are often confounded in discussions of human emotions. However, studies of rodent defensive reactions under naturalistic conditions suggest anxiety is functionally distinct from fear. Unambiguous threats, such as predators, elicit flight from rodents (if an escape-route is available), whereas ambiguous threats (e.g., the odor of a predator) elicit risk assessment behavior, which is associated with anxiety as it is preferentially modulated by anti-anxiety drugs. However, without human evidence, it would be premature to assume that rodent-based psychological models are valid for humans. We tested the human validity of the risk assessment explanation for anxiety by presenting 8 volunteers with emotive scenarios and asking them to pose facial expressions. Photographs and videos of these expressions were shown to 40 participants who matched them to the scenarios and labeled each expression. Scenarios describing ambiguous threats were preferentially matched to the facial expression posed in response to the same scenario type. This expression consisted of two plausible environmental-scanning behaviors (eye darts and head swivels) and was labeled as anxiety, not fear. The facial expression elicited by unambiguous threat scenarios was labeled as fear. The emotion labels generated were then presented to another 18 participants who matched them back to photographs of the facial expressions. This back-matching of labels to faces also linked anxiety to the environmental-scanning face rather than fear face. Results therefore suggest that anxiety produces a distinct facial expression and that it has adaptive value in situations that are ambiguously threatening, supporting a functional, risk-assessing explanation for human anxiety.

AB - Anxiety and fear are often confounded in discussions of human emotions. However, studies of rodent defensive reactions under naturalistic conditions suggest anxiety is functionally distinct from fear. Unambiguous threats, such as predators, elicit flight from rodents (if an escape-route is available), whereas ambiguous threats (e.g., the odor of a predator) elicit risk assessment behavior, which is associated with anxiety as it is preferentially modulated by anti-anxiety drugs. However, without human evidence, it would be premature to assume that rodent-based psychological models are valid for humans. We tested the human validity of the risk assessment explanation for anxiety by presenting 8 volunteers with emotive scenarios and asking them to pose facial expressions. Photographs and videos of these expressions were shown to 40 participants who matched them to the scenarios and labeled each expression. Scenarios describing ambiguous threats were preferentially matched to the facial expression posed in response to the same scenario type. This expression consisted of two plausible environmental-scanning behaviors (eye darts and head swivels) and was labeled as anxiety, not fear. The facial expression elicited by unambiguous threat scenarios was labeled as fear. The emotion labels generated were then presented to another 18 participants who matched them back to photographs of the facial expressions. This back-matching of labels to faces also linked anxiety to the environmental-scanning face rather than fear face. Results therefore suggest that anxiety produces a distinct facial expression and that it has adaptive value in situations that are ambiguously threatening, supporting a functional, risk-assessing explanation for human anxiety.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866151864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/a0026825

U2 - 10.1037/a0026825

DO - 10.1037/a0026825

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 910

EP - 924

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

T2 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -

Perkins AM, Inchley-Mort SL, Pickering AD, Corr PJ, Burgess AP. A facial expression for anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012 May;102(5):910-924. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026825