A memory advantage for past-oriented over future-oriented performance feedback

Robert A. Nash, Naomi E. Winstone, Samantha Gregory, Emily Papps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

People frequently receive performance feedback that describes how well they
achieved in the past, and how they could improve in future. In educational contexts, future-oriented (directive) feedback is often argued to be more valuable to learners than past-oriented (evaluative) feedback; critically, prior research led us to predict that it should also be better remembered. We tested this prediction in six experiments. Subjects read written feedback containing evaluative and directive comments, which supposedly related to essays they had previously written (Experiments 1-2), or to essays another person had written (Experiments 3-6). Subjects then tried to reproduce the feedback from memory after a short delay. In all six experiments, the data strongly revealed the opposite effect to the one we predicted: despite only small differences in wording, evaluative feedback was in fact recalled consistently better than directive feedback. Furthermore, even when adult subjects did recall directive
feedback, they frequently misremembered it in an evaluative style. These findings appear at odds with the position that being oriented toward the future is advantageous to memory. They also raise important questions about the possible behavioral effects and generalizability of such biases, in terms of students’ academic performance.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1864-1879
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition
Volume44
Issue number12
Early online date5 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

performance
experiment
Students
Experiment
human being
trend
Directives
Research
student
Education
Prediction
Person
Academic Performance
Written Feedback

Bibliographical note

© 2018 American Psychological Association. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/xlm0000549

Funding: Leverhulme Trust (Research Project Grant RPG-2016-189) and the Higher Education Academy (Grant GEN1024).

Keywords

  • feedback
  • education
  • future orientation
  • recall
  • assessment

Cite this

Nash, Robert A. ; Winstone, Naomi E. ; Gregory, Samantha ; Papps, Emily. / A memory advantage for past-oriented over future-oriented performance feedback. 2018 ; Vol. 44, No. 12. pp. 1864-1879.
@article{d1624ae09b84483e810f592c9d27ee67,
title = "A memory advantage for past-oriented over future-oriented performance feedback",
abstract = "People frequently receive performance feedback that describes how well theyachieved in the past, and how they could improve in future. In educational contexts, future-oriented (directive) feedback is often argued to be more valuable to learners than past-oriented (evaluative) feedback; critically, prior research led us to predict that it should also be better remembered. We tested this prediction in six experiments. Subjects read written feedback containing evaluative and directive comments, which supposedly related to essays they had previously written (Experiments 1-2), or to essays another person had written (Experiments 3-6). Subjects then tried to reproduce the feedback from memory after a short delay. In all six experiments, the data strongly revealed the opposite effect to the one we predicted: despite only small differences in wording, evaluative feedback was in fact recalled consistently better than directive feedback. Furthermore, even when adult subjects did recall directivefeedback, they frequently misremembered it in an evaluative style. These findings appear at odds with the position that being oriented toward the future is advantageous to memory. They also raise important questions about the possible behavioral effects and generalizability of such biases, in terms of students’ academic performance.",
keywords = "feedback, education, future orientation, recall, assessment",
author = "Nash, {Robert A.} and Winstone, {Naomi E.} and Samantha Gregory and Emily Papps",
note = "{\circledC} 2018 American Psychological Association. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/xlm0000549 Funding: Leverhulme Trust (Research Project Grant RPG-2016-189) and the Higher Education Academy (Grant GEN1024).",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000549",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1864--1879",
number = "12",

}

A memory advantage for past-oriented over future-oriented performance feedback. / Nash, Robert A.; Winstone, Naomi E.; Gregory, Samantha; Papps, Emily.

Vol. 44, No. 12, 05.03.2018, p. 1864-1879.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A memory advantage for past-oriented over future-oriented performance feedback

AU - Nash, Robert A.

AU - Winstone, Naomi E.

AU - Gregory, Samantha

AU - Papps, Emily

N1 - © 2018 American Psychological Association. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/xlm0000549 Funding: Leverhulme Trust (Research Project Grant RPG-2016-189) and the Higher Education Academy (Grant GEN1024).

PY - 2018/3/5

Y1 - 2018/3/5

N2 - People frequently receive performance feedback that describes how well theyachieved in the past, and how they could improve in future. In educational contexts, future-oriented (directive) feedback is often argued to be more valuable to learners than past-oriented (evaluative) feedback; critically, prior research led us to predict that it should also be better remembered. We tested this prediction in six experiments. Subjects read written feedback containing evaluative and directive comments, which supposedly related to essays they had previously written (Experiments 1-2), or to essays another person had written (Experiments 3-6). Subjects then tried to reproduce the feedback from memory after a short delay. In all six experiments, the data strongly revealed the opposite effect to the one we predicted: despite only small differences in wording, evaluative feedback was in fact recalled consistently better than directive feedback. Furthermore, even when adult subjects did recall directivefeedback, they frequently misremembered it in an evaluative style. These findings appear at odds with the position that being oriented toward the future is advantageous to memory. They also raise important questions about the possible behavioral effects and generalizability of such biases, in terms of students’ academic performance.

AB - People frequently receive performance feedback that describes how well theyachieved in the past, and how they could improve in future. In educational contexts, future-oriented (directive) feedback is often argued to be more valuable to learners than past-oriented (evaluative) feedback; critically, prior research led us to predict that it should also be better remembered. We tested this prediction in six experiments. Subjects read written feedback containing evaluative and directive comments, which supposedly related to essays they had previously written (Experiments 1-2), or to essays another person had written (Experiments 3-6). Subjects then tried to reproduce the feedback from memory after a short delay. In all six experiments, the data strongly revealed the opposite effect to the one we predicted: despite only small differences in wording, evaluative feedback was in fact recalled consistently better than directive feedback. Furthermore, even when adult subjects did recall directivefeedback, they frequently misremembered it in an evaluative style. These findings appear at odds with the position that being oriented toward the future is advantageous to memory. They also raise important questions about the possible behavioral effects and generalizability of such biases, in terms of students’ academic performance.

KW - feedback

KW - education

KW - future orientation

KW - recall

KW - assessment

UR - http://doi.org/10.17036/researchdata.aston.ac.uk.00000313

UR - http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2018-09034-001.html

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000549

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000549

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1864

EP - 1879

IS - 12

ER -