A method for automatically eliciting node weights in a hierarchical knowledge-based structure for reasoning with uncertainty

S.E. Hegazy, Chris D. Buckingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Hierarchical knowledge structures are frequently used within clinical decision support systems as part of the model for generating intelligent advice. The nodes in the hierarchy inevitably have varying influence on the decisionmaking processes, which needs to be reflected by parameters. If the model has been elicited from human experts, it is not feasible to ask them to estimate the parameters because there will be so many in even moderately-sized structures. This paper describes how the parameters could be obtained from data instead, using only a small number of cases. The original method [1] is applied to a particular web-based clinical decision support system called GRiST, which uses its hierarchical knowledge to quantify the risks associated with mental-health problems. The knowledge was elicited from multidisciplinary mental-health practitioners but the tree has several thousand nodes, all requiring an estimation of their relative influence on the assessment process. The method described in the paper shows how they can be obtained from about 200 cases instead. It greatly reduces the experts’ elicitation tasks and has the potential for being generalised to similar knowledge-engineering domains where relative weightings of node siblings are part of the parameter space.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-83
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal on Advances in Software
Volume2
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Decision support systems
Knowledge engineering
Medical problems
Health
Uncertainty

Bibliographical note

The copyright for each included paper belongs to the authors. IARIA journals are made available for free, proving the appropriate references are made when their
content is used.

Keywords

  • clinical decision support systems
  • mental health
  • risk screening
  • hierarchical knowledge
  • decision trees
  • mathematical modelling

Cite this

@article{1f55f4a9852b4db9b3e373f93fbddfe9,
title = "A method for automatically eliciting node weights in a hierarchical knowledge-based structure for reasoning with uncertainty",
abstract = "Hierarchical knowledge structures are frequently used within clinical decision support systems as part of the model for generating intelligent advice. The nodes in the hierarchy inevitably have varying influence on the decisionmaking processes, which needs to be reflected by parameters. If the model has been elicited from human experts, it is not feasible to ask them to estimate the parameters because there will be so many in even moderately-sized structures. This paper describes how the parameters could be obtained from data instead, using only a small number of cases. The original method [1] is applied to a particular web-based clinical decision support system called GRiST, which uses its hierarchical knowledge to quantify the risks associated with mental-health problems. The knowledge was elicited from multidisciplinary mental-health practitioners but the tree has several thousand nodes, all requiring an estimation of their relative influence on the assessment process. The method described in the paper shows how they can be obtained from about 200 cases instead. It greatly reduces the experts’ elicitation tasks and has the potential for being generalised to similar knowledge-engineering domains where relative weightings of node siblings are part of the parameter space.",
keywords = "clinical decision support systems, mental health, risk screening, hierarchical knowledge, decision trees, mathematical modelling",
author = "S.E. Hegazy and Buckingham, {Chris D.}",
note = "The copyright for each included paper belongs to the authors. IARIA journals are made available for free, proving the appropriate references are made when their content is used.",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "76--83",
journal = "International Journal on Advances in Software",
issn = "1942-2628",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method for automatically eliciting node weights in a hierarchical knowledge-based structure for reasoning with uncertainty

AU - Hegazy, S.E.

AU - Buckingham, Chris D.

N1 - The copyright for each included paper belongs to the authors. IARIA journals are made available for free, proving the appropriate references are made when their content is used.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Hierarchical knowledge structures are frequently used within clinical decision support systems as part of the model for generating intelligent advice. The nodes in the hierarchy inevitably have varying influence on the decisionmaking processes, which needs to be reflected by parameters. If the model has been elicited from human experts, it is not feasible to ask them to estimate the parameters because there will be so many in even moderately-sized structures. This paper describes how the parameters could be obtained from data instead, using only a small number of cases. The original method [1] is applied to a particular web-based clinical decision support system called GRiST, which uses its hierarchical knowledge to quantify the risks associated with mental-health problems. The knowledge was elicited from multidisciplinary mental-health practitioners but the tree has several thousand nodes, all requiring an estimation of their relative influence on the assessment process. The method described in the paper shows how they can be obtained from about 200 cases instead. It greatly reduces the experts’ elicitation tasks and has the potential for being generalised to similar knowledge-engineering domains where relative weightings of node siblings are part of the parameter space.

AB - Hierarchical knowledge structures are frequently used within clinical decision support systems as part of the model for generating intelligent advice. The nodes in the hierarchy inevitably have varying influence on the decisionmaking processes, which needs to be reflected by parameters. If the model has been elicited from human experts, it is not feasible to ask them to estimate the parameters because there will be so many in even moderately-sized structures. This paper describes how the parameters could be obtained from data instead, using only a small number of cases. The original method [1] is applied to a particular web-based clinical decision support system called GRiST, which uses its hierarchical knowledge to quantify the risks associated with mental-health problems. The knowledge was elicited from multidisciplinary mental-health practitioners but the tree has several thousand nodes, all requiring an estimation of their relative influence on the assessment process. The method described in the paper shows how they can be obtained from about 200 cases instead. It greatly reduces the experts’ elicitation tasks and has the potential for being generalised to similar knowledge-engineering domains where relative weightings of node siblings are part of the parameter space.

KW - clinical decision support systems

KW - mental health

KW - risk screening

KW - hierarchical knowledge

KW - decision trees

KW - mathematical modelling

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 76

EP - 83

JO - International Journal on Advances in Software

JF - International Journal on Advances in Software

SN - 1942-2628

IS - 1

ER -