Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A model of metadiscourse for multi-audience talk—the case of police interviews

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The study of metadiscourse, or commentary on ongoing talk or text, has its origins in the context of academic writing, and the phenomenon has since been explored in relation to a range of types of institutional talk including classroom interaction, health communication, public hearings, parliamentary debates, and courtroom interaction. This paper turns attention to the discourse event of the police investigative interview, drawing on a small corpus of interactions with individuals reporting rape to an English police force in 2019/2020. I identify a range of instances of metadiscourse functioning interactively and interactionally, with some pointing to other points within the interaction, some flagging the interviewers’ and interviewees’ roles in relation to the unfolding talk, and a final category of features speaking explicitly to the eventual audience of the interview—the broader legal system and the Court at a potential future trial. I propose a bespoke model of metadiscourse to fit this specific multiaudience interaction type.
Original languageEnglish
JournalApplied Linguistics
Early online date26 Sept 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Sept 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Funding

This work was funded by a British Academy/Leverhulme Small Grant reference SRG22\220098 and a Leverhulme Fellowship reference RF-2025-218.

FundersFunder number
Leverhulme TrustRF-2025-218
British AcademySRG22\"220098

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A model of metadiscourse for multi-audience talk—the case of police interviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this