A qualitative investigation of decision making during help-seeking for adult hearing loss

Helen Pryce , Amanda Hall, Ariane Laplante-Lévesque, Elizabeth Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The Any Qualified Provider framework in the National Health Service has changed the way adult audiology services are offered in England. Under the new rules, patients are being offered a choice in geographical location and audiology provider. This study aimed to explore how choices in treatment are presented and to identify what information patients need when they are seeking help with hearing loss.
Design: This study adopted qualitative methods of ethnographic observations and focus group interviews to identify information needed prior to, and during, help-seeking. Observational data and focus group data were analysed using the constant comparison method of grounded theory.
Study sample: Participants were recruited from a community Health and Social Care Trust in the west of England. This service incorporates both an Audiology and a Hearing Therapy service. Twenty seven participants were involved in focus groups or interviews. Results: Participants receive little information beyond the detail of hearing aids. Participants report little information that was not directly related to uptake of hearing aids.
Conclusions: Participant preferences were not explored and limited information resulted in decisions that were clinician-led. The gaps in information reflect previous data on clinician communication and highlight the need for consistent information on a range of interventions to manage hearing loss.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)658-665
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Audiology
Volume55
Issue number11
Early online date6 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016
EventHearing Accross the Lifespan - Como, Como, Italy
Duration: 2 Jun 20164 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Audiology
Focus Groups
Hearing Loss
Decision Making
Hearing Aids
decision making
England
Interviews
Community Health Services
National Health Programs
Hearing
Communication
comparison of methods
Therapeutics
Group
interview
Hearing Impairment
grounded theory
qualitative method
health service

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology on 10/6/16, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14992027.2016.1202455

Keywords

  • adult audiology
  • decision aid
  • hearing aid
  • option grid
  • shared decision making

Cite this

@article{5c58824482f44849ab814b7fc26ea070,
title = "A qualitative investigation of decision making during help-seeking for adult hearing loss",
abstract = "Objective: The Any Qualified Provider framework in the National Health Service has changed the way adult audiology services are offered in England. Under the new rules, patients are being offered a choice in geographical location and audiology provider. This study aimed to explore how choices in treatment are presented and to identify what information patients need when they are seeking help with hearing loss. Design: This study adopted qualitative methods of ethnographic observations and focus group interviews to identify information needed prior to, and during, help-seeking. Observational data and focus group data were analysed using the constant comparison method of grounded theory. Study sample: Participants were recruited from a community Health and Social Care Trust in the west of England. This service incorporates both an Audiology and a Hearing Therapy service. Twenty seven participants were involved in focus groups or interviews. Results: Participants receive little information beyond the detail of hearing aids. Participants report little information that was not directly related to uptake of hearing aids. Conclusions: Participant preferences were not explored and limited information resulted in decisions that were clinician-led. The gaps in information reflect previous data on clinician communication and highlight the need for consistent information on a range of interventions to manage hearing loss.",
keywords = "adult audiology, decision aid, hearing aid, option grid, shared decision making",
author = "Helen Pryce and Amanda Hall and Ariane Laplante-L{\'e}vesque and Elizabeth Clark",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology on 10/6/16, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14992027.2016.1202455",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/14992027.2016.1202455",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "658--665",
journal = "International Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1499-2027",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "11",

}

A qualitative investigation of decision making during help-seeking for adult hearing loss. / Pryce , Helen; Hall, Amanda; Laplante-Lévesque, Ariane; Clark, Elizabeth.

In: International Journal of Audiology, Vol. 55, No. 11, 11.2016, p. 658-665.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative investigation of decision making during help-seeking for adult hearing loss

AU - Pryce , Helen

AU - Hall, Amanda

AU - Laplante-Lévesque, Ariane

AU - Clark, Elizabeth

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology on 10/6/16, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14992027.2016.1202455

PY - 2016/11

Y1 - 2016/11

N2 - Objective: The Any Qualified Provider framework in the National Health Service has changed the way adult audiology services are offered in England. Under the new rules, patients are being offered a choice in geographical location and audiology provider. This study aimed to explore how choices in treatment are presented and to identify what information patients need when they are seeking help with hearing loss. Design: This study adopted qualitative methods of ethnographic observations and focus group interviews to identify information needed prior to, and during, help-seeking. Observational data and focus group data were analysed using the constant comparison method of grounded theory. Study sample: Participants were recruited from a community Health and Social Care Trust in the west of England. This service incorporates both an Audiology and a Hearing Therapy service. Twenty seven participants were involved in focus groups or interviews. Results: Participants receive little information beyond the detail of hearing aids. Participants report little information that was not directly related to uptake of hearing aids. Conclusions: Participant preferences were not explored and limited information resulted in decisions that were clinician-led. The gaps in information reflect previous data on clinician communication and highlight the need for consistent information on a range of interventions to manage hearing loss.

AB - Objective: The Any Qualified Provider framework in the National Health Service has changed the way adult audiology services are offered in England. Under the new rules, patients are being offered a choice in geographical location and audiology provider. This study aimed to explore how choices in treatment are presented and to identify what information patients need when they are seeking help with hearing loss. Design: This study adopted qualitative methods of ethnographic observations and focus group interviews to identify information needed prior to, and during, help-seeking. Observational data and focus group data were analysed using the constant comparison method of grounded theory. Study sample: Participants were recruited from a community Health and Social Care Trust in the west of England. This service incorporates both an Audiology and a Hearing Therapy service. Twenty seven participants were involved in focus groups or interviews. Results: Participants receive little information beyond the detail of hearing aids. Participants report little information that was not directly related to uptake of hearing aids. Conclusions: Participant preferences were not explored and limited information resulted in decisions that were clinician-led. The gaps in information reflect previous data on clinician communication and highlight the need for consistent information on a range of interventions to manage hearing loss.

KW - adult audiology

KW - decision aid

KW - hearing aid

KW - option grid

KW - shared decision making

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14992027.2016.1202455

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978999354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14992027.2016.1202455

DO - 10.1080/14992027.2016.1202455

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 658

EP - 665

JO - International Journal of Audiology

JF - International Journal of Audiology

SN - 1499-2027

IS - 11

ER -