A quantifiable method of assessing the risk of selecting the lowest bidder in construction projects: A literature review

Gerald Eke, Gayan Wedawatta, John Elgy

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Contractor selection is an important step in ensuring the success of any construction project. Failing to adequately select the winning contractor may lead to problems in the project delivery phase such as bad quality and delay in the expected project duration; which ultimately results in cost overruns. This paper reviewed the strength of existing studies on the link between contractor selection strategy and project outcomes, with a view of proposing an approach on how one might try to examine this relationship moving forward. There are research that try to establish a direct relationship between contractor selection strategy and the outcome of the construction project. There are also decision support tools such as AHP or ANP that help clients prioritise various factors when selecting contractors. However the majority of these research and tools are informed by self-perception questionnaires and surveys that makes it difficult to gauge the strength of the relationship between contractor selection and project outcomes. In other words, there are hardly any empirical research that tries to establish this relationship. Literature review on the sources of cost overruns did not entirely reveal contractor selection as a main source of cost overrun; although from the explanations given for causes of cost overruns, one would be able to see how wrong contractor selection does play a part. Literature review on the various approaches to contractor selection on the other hand, did little to show the effect of contractor selection on the outcome of construction projects. Hence, the future direction of the research is to help clients see choosing a particular contractor selection strategy; whether lowest bid, or best value, affects the outcome of a construction project: cost and duration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages637-646
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017
Event13th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2017 - University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
Duration: 14 Sep 201715 Sep 2017
http://usir.salford.ac.uk/43913/1/13th%20IPGRC%202017%20Full%20Conference%20Proceedings.pdf#page=1

Conference

Conference13th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2017
CountryUnited Kingdom
CitySalford
Period14/09/1715/09/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Literature review
Construction project
Contractor selection
Cost overrun
Contractors
Costs
Decision support
Self-perception
Empirical research
Future directions
Bid
Questionnaire
Project delivery
Factors

Bibliographical note

© The Authors

Keywords

  • Cost overrun
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Contractor selection
  • tendering
  • Best Value
  • Best value contractor
  • Lowest priced contractor

Cite this

Eke, G., Wedawatta, G., & Elgy, J. (2017). A quantifiable method of assessing the risk of selecting the lowest bidder in construction projects: A literature review. 637-646. Paper presented at 13th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2017, Salford, United Kingdom.
Eke, Gerald ; Wedawatta, Gayan ; Elgy, John. / A quantifiable method of assessing the risk of selecting the lowest bidder in construction projects : A literature review. Paper presented at 13th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2017, Salford, United Kingdom.10 p.
@conference{f1b645a2a0604464bc2011d9d8a4e71e,
title = "A quantifiable method of assessing the risk of selecting the lowest bidder in construction projects: A literature review",
abstract = "Contractor selection is an important step in ensuring the success of any construction project. Failing to adequately select the winning contractor may lead to problems in the project delivery phase such as bad quality and delay in the expected project duration; which ultimately results in cost overruns. This paper reviewed the strength of existing studies on the link between contractor selection strategy and project outcomes, with a view of proposing an approach on how one might try to examine this relationship moving forward. There are research that try to establish a direct relationship between contractor selection strategy and the outcome of the construction project. There are also decision support tools such as AHP or ANP that help clients prioritise various factors when selecting contractors. However the majority of these research and tools are informed by self-perception questionnaires and surveys that makes it difficult to gauge the strength of the relationship between contractor selection and project outcomes. In other words, there are hardly any empirical research that tries to establish this relationship. Literature review on the sources of cost overruns did not entirely reveal contractor selection as a main source of cost overrun; although from the explanations given for causes of cost overruns, one would be able to see how wrong contractor selection does play a part. Literature review on the various approaches to contractor selection on the other hand, did little to show the effect of contractor selection on the outcome of construction projects. Hence, the future direction of the research is to help clients see choosing a particular contractor selection strategy; whether lowest bid, or best value, affects the outcome of a construction project: cost and duration.",
keywords = "Cost overrun, Costs and Cost Analysis, Contractor selection, tendering, Best Value, Best value contractor, Lowest priced contractor",
author = "Gerald Eke and Gayan Wedawatta and John Elgy",
note = "{\circledC} The Authors; 13th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2017 ; Conference date: 14-09-2017 Through 15-09-2017",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
language = "English",
pages = "637--646",
url = "http://usir.salford.ac.uk/43913/1/13th{\%}20IPGRC{\%}202017{\%}20Full{\%}20Conference{\%}20Proceedings.pdf#page=1",

}

Eke, G, Wedawatta, G & Elgy, J 2017, 'A quantifiable method of assessing the risk of selecting the lowest bidder in construction projects: A literature review' Paper presented at 13th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2017, Salford, United Kingdom, 14/09/17 - 15/09/17, pp. 637-646.

A quantifiable method of assessing the risk of selecting the lowest bidder in construction projects : A literature review. / Eke, Gerald; Wedawatta, Gayan; Elgy, John.

2017. 637-646 Paper presented at 13th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2017, Salford, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - A quantifiable method of assessing the risk of selecting the lowest bidder in construction projects

T2 - A literature review

AU - Eke, Gerald

AU - Wedawatta, Gayan

AU - Elgy, John

N1 - © The Authors

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Contractor selection is an important step in ensuring the success of any construction project. Failing to adequately select the winning contractor may lead to problems in the project delivery phase such as bad quality and delay in the expected project duration; which ultimately results in cost overruns. This paper reviewed the strength of existing studies on the link between contractor selection strategy and project outcomes, with a view of proposing an approach on how one might try to examine this relationship moving forward. There are research that try to establish a direct relationship between contractor selection strategy and the outcome of the construction project. There are also decision support tools such as AHP or ANP that help clients prioritise various factors when selecting contractors. However the majority of these research and tools are informed by self-perception questionnaires and surveys that makes it difficult to gauge the strength of the relationship between contractor selection and project outcomes. In other words, there are hardly any empirical research that tries to establish this relationship. Literature review on the sources of cost overruns did not entirely reveal contractor selection as a main source of cost overrun; although from the explanations given for causes of cost overruns, one would be able to see how wrong contractor selection does play a part. Literature review on the various approaches to contractor selection on the other hand, did little to show the effect of contractor selection on the outcome of construction projects. Hence, the future direction of the research is to help clients see choosing a particular contractor selection strategy; whether lowest bid, or best value, affects the outcome of a construction project: cost and duration.

AB - Contractor selection is an important step in ensuring the success of any construction project. Failing to adequately select the winning contractor may lead to problems in the project delivery phase such as bad quality and delay in the expected project duration; which ultimately results in cost overruns. This paper reviewed the strength of existing studies on the link between contractor selection strategy and project outcomes, with a view of proposing an approach on how one might try to examine this relationship moving forward. There are research that try to establish a direct relationship between contractor selection strategy and the outcome of the construction project. There are also decision support tools such as AHP or ANP that help clients prioritise various factors when selecting contractors. However the majority of these research and tools are informed by self-perception questionnaires and surveys that makes it difficult to gauge the strength of the relationship between contractor selection and project outcomes. In other words, there are hardly any empirical research that tries to establish this relationship. Literature review on the sources of cost overruns did not entirely reveal contractor selection as a main source of cost overrun; although from the explanations given for causes of cost overruns, one would be able to see how wrong contractor selection does play a part. Literature review on the various approaches to contractor selection on the other hand, did little to show the effect of contractor selection on the outcome of construction projects. Hence, the future direction of the research is to help clients see choosing a particular contractor selection strategy; whether lowest bid, or best value, affects the outcome of a construction project: cost and duration.

KW - Cost overrun

KW - Costs and Cost Analysis

KW - Contractor selection

KW - tendering

KW - Best Value

KW - Best value contractor

KW - Lowest priced contractor

UR - http://usir.salford.ac.uk/43913/1/13th%20IPGRC%202017%20Full%20Conference%20Proceedings.pdf#page=1

M3 - Paper

SP - 637

EP - 646

ER -

Eke G, Wedawatta G, Elgy J. A quantifiable method of assessing the risk of selecting the lowest bidder in construction projects: A literature review. 2017. Paper presented at 13th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2017, Salford, United Kingdom.