A response to EA-4/23 INF:2025 “The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO/IEC 17025:2017”

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison*, A. Biedermann, M. Tart, D. Meuwly, C.E.H. Berger , J. Guiness, M.M. Houck, C. Gibb, A.P. Dawid, K.N. Kotsoglou, D.H. Kaye, P. Rose, F. Taroni, B. Kokshoorn, M.J. Saks, J.S. Buckleton, J.M. Curran, D. Taylor, C. Zhang, J. VuilleC. Champod, B.T. Simonsen, A. Mattei, J.J. Lucena-Molina, S. Zabell, J.M. Chin, M. Gallidabino, G. Wevers, R. Moreton, H. Eldridge, K.A. Martire, C.G.G. Aitken, S.A. Cole, J. González-Rodríguez, M. Smithuis, T. Edvardsen, L. Wilson-Wilde , G. Zadora, S. Gittelson, G. Jackson, M.J. Sjerps, F. Brard, T. Hicks, J. Kennedy, B.G.H. Latten, Philip Weber, S. Willis, Daniel Ramos, J.J. Koehler, Rafael Oliveira Ribeiro, F. Crispino, Nabanita Basu, G.E. Meakin, K.P. Kirkbride, G. Tully, M. Jessen, D. Syndercombe Court

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter, comment/opinion or interview

2 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

We are concerned that EA-4/23 INF:2025 The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO/IEC 17025:2017 provides inappropriate guidance on how to conduct forensic interpretation and on how to report forensic opinions. Following this guidance would result in misleading statements being provided to legal decision makers, which would potentially have adverse consequences.
Original languageEnglish
Article number112589
Number of pages20
JournalForensic Science International
Volume376
Early online date5 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A response to EA-4/23 INF:2025 “The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO/IEC 17025:2017”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this