Abstract
Reflection is generally considered a key part of learning, enabling the student to clarify their understanding, embed knowledge and identify gaps in proficiency. In this regard it is also a potentially important tool to support lifelong learning.
Reflective practice is however often an assumed competence, not always explicitly taught or encouraged. In this work we investigate student attitudes and experiences of reflective practice. Two groups of students were asked to identify why they feel reflective practice should (or should not) be part of the curriculum while also identifying hurdles to implementation, together with tools and tips to support students in adopting reflection. This was achieved via debate and guided small group work. Results showed students generally appreciated the benefits of reflective practice. There was however concern that it might add to the student workload and that less motivated students would not engage. Debates on whether the technique should be compulsory and assessed produced mixed results. Interestingly, the students interpreted reflection in a very wide sense and wider than might be expected in conventional academic discourse, going beyond reflecting on immediate academic content to reflecting on mindsets, well-being and learning environments. Students expressed concerns however over reflection being another topic to learn, adding load into the curriculum and one difficult to adopt among students otherwise preoccupied with technical methodologies.
Reflective practice is however often an assumed competence, not always explicitly taught or encouraged. In this work we investigate student attitudes and experiences of reflective practice. Two groups of students were asked to identify why they feel reflective practice should (or should not) be part of the curriculum while also identifying hurdles to implementation, together with tools and tips to support students in adopting reflection. This was achieved via debate and guided small group work. Results showed students generally appreciated the benefits of reflective practice. There was however concern that it might add to the student workload and that less motivated students would not engage. Debates on whether the technique should be compulsory and assessed produced mixed results. Interestingly, the students interpreted reflection in a very wide sense and wider than might be expected in conventional academic discourse, going beyond reflecting on immediate academic content to reflecting on mindsets, well-being and learning environments. Students expressed concerns however over reflection being another topic to learn, adding load into the curriculum and one difficult to adopt among students otherwise preoccupied with technical methodologies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) 2024 |
Subtitle of host publication | Educating Responsible Engineers |
Number of pages | 10 |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 3 Sept 2024 |
Event | SEFI 2024: Educating Responsible Engineers - EPFL Campus, Lake Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland Duration: 2 Sept 2024 → 5 Sept 2024 https://sefi2024.eu/ |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings of the SEFI Conference |
---|
Conference
Conference | SEFI 2024 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Switzerland |
City | Lausanne |
Period | 2/09/24 → 5/09/24 |
Internet address |