A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy

A.B. Gilmore, G. Fooks, M. Mckee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

State-owned tobacco companies, which still account for 40% of global cigarette production, face continued pressure from, among others, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to be privatised. This review of available literature on tobacco industry privatisation suggests that any economic benefits of privatisation may be lower than supposed, because private owners avoid competitive tenders (thus underpaying for assets), negotiate lengthy tax holidays and are complicit in the smuggling of cigarettes to avoid import and excise duties. It outlines how privatisation leads to increased marketing, more effective distribution and lower prices, creating additional demand for cigarettes among new and existing smokers, leading to increased cigarette consumption, higher smoking prevalence and lower age of smoking initiation. Privatisation also weakens tobacco control because private owners, in their drive for profits, lobby aggressively against effective policies and ignore or overturn existing policies.

This evidence suggests that further tobacco industry privatisation is likely to increase smoking and that instead of transferring assets from state to private ownership, alternative models of supply should be explored.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)621-642
JournalGlobal Public Health
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Tobacco industry
Privatization
Smoking
Cigarettes
Owners
Assets
Alternative models
Lobbies
Tobacco
International Monetary Fund
Economic benefits
Import
Holidays
Tobacco control
Private ownership
Marketing
Tax
Cigarette consumption
Smuggling

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Global Public Health on 27 July 2011, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17441692.2011.595727

Cite this

Gilmore, A.B. ; Fooks, G. ; Mckee, M. / A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy. In: Global Public Health. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 6. pp. 621-642.
@article{7de29fa5757d4e11bc89def53e5b7002,
title = "A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy",
abstract = "State-owned tobacco companies, which still account for 40{\%} of global cigarette production, face continued pressure from, among others, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to be privatised. This review of available literature on tobacco industry privatisation suggests that any economic benefits of privatisation may be lower than supposed, because private owners avoid competitive tenders (thus underpaying for assets), negotiate lengthy tax holidays and are complicit in the smuggling of cigarettes to avoid import and excise duties. It outlines how privatisation leads to increased marketing, more effective distribution and lower prices, creating additional demand for cigarettes among new and existing smokers, leading to increased cigarette consumption, higher smoking prevalence and lower age of smoking initiation. Privatisation also weakens tobacco control because private owners, in their drive for profits, lobby aggressively against effective policies and ignore or overturn existing policies.This evidence suggests that further tobacco industry privatisation is likely to increase smoking and that instead of transferring assets from state to private ownership, alternative models of supply should be explored.",
author = "A.B. Gilmore and G. Fooks and M. Mckee",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Global Public Health on 27 July 2011, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17441692.2011.595727",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/17441692.2011.595727",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "621--642",
number = "6",

}

A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy. / Gilmore, A.B.; Fooks, G.; Mckee, M.

In: Global Public Health, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2011, p. 621-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy

AU - Gilmore, A.B.

AU - Fooks, G.

AU - Mckee, M.

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Global Public Health on 27 July 2011, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17441692.2011.595727

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - State-owned tobacco companies, which still account for 40% of global cigarette production, face continued pressure from, among others, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to be privatised. This review of available literature on tobacco industry privatisation suggests that any economic benefits of privatisation may be lower than supposed, because private owners avoid competitive tenders (thus underpaying for assets), negotiate lengthy tax holidays and are complicit in the smuggling of cigarettes to avoid import and excise duties. It outlines how privatisation leads to increased marketing, more effective distribution and lower prices, creating additional demand for cigarettes among new and existing smokers, leading to increased cigarette consumption, higher smoking prevalence and lower age of smoking initiation. Privatisation also weakens tobacco control because private owners, in their drive for profits, lobby aggressively against effective policies and ignore or overturn existing policies.This evidence suggests that further tobacco industry privatisation is likely to increase smoking and that instead of transferring assets from state to private ownership, alternative models of supply should be explored.

AB - State-owned tobacco companies, which still account for 40% of global cigarette production, face continued pressure from, among others, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), to be privatised. This review of available literature on tobacco industry privatisation suggests that any economic benefits of privatisation may be lower than supposed, because private owners avoid competitive tenders (thus underpaying for assets), negotiate lengthy tax holidays and are complicit in the smuggling of cigarettes to avoid import and excise duties. It outlines how privatisation leads to increased marketing, more effective distribution and lower prices, creating additional demand for cigarettes among new and existing smokers, leading to increased cigarette consumption, higher smoking prevalence and lower age of smoking initiation. Privatisation also weakens tobacco control because private owners, in their drive for profits, lobby aggressively against effective policies and ignore or overturn existing policies.This evidence suggests that further tobacco industry privatisation is likely to increase smoking and that instead of transferring assets from state to private ownership, alternative models of supply should be explored.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79960965298&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1080/17441692.2011.595727

DO - 10.1080/17441692.2011.595727

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 621

EP - 642

IS - 6

ER -