A Snapshot of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Success, Failure and Proposals for Reform

Christopher Umfreville, Peter Walton, Lezelle Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

The Company Voluntary Arrangement (“CVA”), introduced by the Insolvency Act 1986, was born out of the Cork Committee, which in 1982 identified the need for a simple procedure where the will of the majority of creditors in agreeing to a debt arrangement could be made binding on an unwilling minority.

1. Despite the availability of this flexible restructuring tool for over three decades, the frequency of CVAs is reasonably low when compared with alternative corporate Insolvency Act 1986 procedures and it has been commented that CVAs have a high failure rate.

2. The CVA has risen to prominence recently with a number of high profile cases drawing media attention and, at times, creditor criticism.

3. It is in this context that the authors were commissioned by R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals, and the ICAEW, to consider the reasons for the ‘success’ or ‘failure’ of CVAs and investigate the outcomes where CVAs fail.

The aim of the project was to identify key characteristics which will allow practical guidance to be provided to insolvency practitioners (“IPs”) and also inform policy recommendations to Government. This led to the publication in May 2018 of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Evaluating Success and Failure (“the Report”). This paper represents a summary of the key findings of the Report.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Insolvency Review
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 21 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

insolvency
creditor
reform
act
indebtedness
restructuring
Insolvency

Keywords

  • Corporate Insolvency
  • CVA
  • Company Voluntary Arrangement
  • Corporate Rescue

Cite this

Umfreville, C., Walton, P., & Jacobs, L. (Accepted/In press). A Snapshot of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Success, Failure and Proposals for Reform. International Insolvency Review.
Umfreville, Christopher ; Walton, Peter ; Jacobs, Lezelle. / A Snapshot of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Success, Failure and Proposals for Reform. In: International Insolvency Review. 2019.
@article{6637636aa36d4e2db595fe0ededa9a99,
title = "A Snapshot of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Success, Failure and Proposals for Reform",
abstract = "The Company Voluntary Arrangement (“CVA”), introduced by the Insolvency Act 1986, was born out of the Cork Committee, which in 1982 identified the need for a simple procedure where the will of the majority of creditors in agreeing to a debt arrangement could be made binding on an unwilling minority.1. Despite the availability of this flexible restructuring tool for over three decades, the frequency of CVAs is reasonably low when compared with alternative corporate Insolvency Act 1986 procedures and it has been commented that CVAs have a high failure rate.2. The CVA has risen to prominence recently with a number of high profile cases drawing media attention and, at times, creditor criticism.3. It is in this context that the authors were commissioned by R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals, and the ICAEW, to consider the reasons for the ‘success’ or ‘failure’ of CVAs and investigate the outcomes where CVAs fail. The aim of the project was to identify key characteristics which will allow practical guidance to be provided to insolvency practitioners (“IPs”) and also inform policy recommendations to Government. This led to the publication in May 2018 of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Evaluating Success and Failure (“the Report”). This paper represents a summary of the key findings of the Report.",
keywords = "Corporate Insolvency, CVA, Company Voluntary Arrangement, Corporate Rescue",
author = "Christopher Umfreville and Peter Walton and Lezelle Jacobs",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "21",
language = "English",

}

A Snapshot of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Success, Failure and Proposals for Reform. / Umfreville, Christopher; Walton, Peter; Jacobs, Lezelle.

In: International Insolvency Review, 21.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Snapshot of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Success, Failure and Proposals for Reform

AU - Umfreville, Christopher

AU - Walton, Peter

AU - Jacobs, Lezelle

PY - 2019/2/21

Y1 - 2019/2/21

N2 - The Company Voluntary Arrangement (“CVA”), introduced by the Insolvency Act 1986, was born out of the Cork Committee, which in 1982 identified the need for a simple procedure where the will of the majority of creditors in agreeing to a debt arrangement could be made binding on an unwilling minority.1. Despite the availability of this flexible restructuring tool for over three decades, the frequency of CVAs is reasonably low when compared with alternative corporate Insolvency Act 1986 procedures and it has been commented that CVAs have a high failure rate.2. The CVA has risen to prominence recently with a number of high profile cases drawing media attention and, at times, creditor criticism.3. It is in this context that the authors were commissioned by R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals, and the ICAEW, to consider the reasons for the ‘success’ or ‘failure’ of CVAs and investigate the outcomes where CVAs fail. The aim of the project was to identify key characteristics which will allow practical guidance to be provided to insolvency practitioners (“IPs”) and also inform policy recommendations to Government. This led to the publication in May 2018 of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Evaluating Success and Failure (“the Report”). This paper represents a summary of the key findings of the Report.

AB - The Company Voluntary Arrangement (“CVA”), introduced by the Insolvency Act 1986, was born out of the Cork Committee, which in 1982 identified the need for a simple procedure where the will of the majority of creditors in agreeing to a debt arrangement could be made binding on an unwilling minority.1. Despite the availability of this flexible restructuring tool for over three decades, the frequency of CVAs is reasonably low when compared with alternative corporate Insolvency Act 1986 procedures and it has been commented that CVAs have a high failure rate.2. The CVA has risen to prominence recently with a number of high profile cases drawing media attention and, at times, creditor criticism.3. It is in this context that the authors were commissioned by R3, the Association of Business Recovery Professionals, and the ICAEW, to consider the reasons for the ‘success’ or ‘failure’ of CVAs and investigate the outcomes where CVAs fail. The aim of the project was to identify key characteristics which will allow practical guidance to be provided to insolvency practitioners (“IPs”) and also inform policy recommendations to Government. This led to the publication in May 2018 of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Evaluating Success and Failure (“the Report”). This paper represents a summary of the key findings of the Report.

KW - Corporate Insolvency

KW - CVA

KW - Company Voluntary Arrangement

KW - Corporate Rescue

UR - https://www.r3.org.uk/media/documents/policy/policy_papers/corporate_insolvency/R3_ICAEW_CVA_Report_May_2018.pdf

M3 - Conference article

ER -

Umfreville C, Walton P, Jacobs L. A Snapshot of Company Voluntary Arrangements: Success, Failure and Proposals for Reform. International Insolvency Review. 2019 Feb 21.