A survey of continuous improvement practices in the United Kingdom and Mexico

Luis A.J. Borges, Andrew Greasley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

With the advent of globalisation companies all around the world must improve their performance in order to survive. The threats are coming from everywhere, and in different ways, such as low cost products, high quality products, new technologies, and new products. Different companies in different countries are using various techniques and using quality criteria items to strive for excellence. Continuous improvement techniques are used to enable companies to improve their operations. Therefore, companies are using techniques such as TQM, Kaizen, Six-Sigma, Lean Manufacturing, and quality award criteria items such as Customer Focus, Human Resources, Information & Analysis, and Process Management.
The purpose of this paper is to compare the use of these techniques and criteria items in two countries, Mexico and the United Kingdom, which differ in culture and industrial structure. In terms of the use of continuous improvement tools and techniques, Mexico formally started to deal with continuous improvement by creating its National Quality Award soon after the Americans began the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The United Kingdom formally started by using the European Quality Award (EQA), modified and renamed as the EFQM Excellence Model.
The methodology used in this study was to undertake a literature review of the subject matter and to study some general applications around the world. A questionnaire survey was then designed and a survey undertaken based on the same scale, about the same sample size, and the about the same industrial sector within the two countries. The survey presents a brief definition of each of the constructs to facilitate understanding of the questions. The analysis of the data was then conducted with the assistance of a statistical software package. The survey results indicate both similarities and differences in the strengths and weaknesses of the companies in the two countries. One outcome of the analysis is that it enables the companies to use the results to benchmark themselves and thus act to reinforce their strengths and to reduce their weaknesses.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationQuality innovation knowledge
Subtitle of host publicationconderence proceedings : application and synthesis in the global economy
EditorsAmrik Sohal, Richard Cooney
Pages125-130
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Event7th International Conference on Quality, Innovation and Knowledge Management - Kuala Lumpar, Malaysia
Duration: 16 Feb 200518 Feb 2005

Conference

Conference7th International Conference on Quality, Innovation and Knowledge Management
CountryMalaysia
CityKuala Lumpar
Period16/02/0518/02/05

Fingerprint

Mexico
Continuous improvement
Quality awards
Lean manufacturing
Process management
Methodology
Sample size
Kaizen
New products
Industrial structure
Industrial sector
Six Sigma
Excellence
Software
Product quality
Customer focus
Product cost
Threat
Literature review
Questionnaire survey

Cite this

Borges, L. A. J., & Greasley, A. (2005). A survey of continuous improvement practices in the United Kingdom and Mexico. In A. Sohal, & R. Cooney (Eds.), Quality innovation knowledge: conderence proceedings : application and synthesis in the global economy (pp. 125-130)
Borges, Luis A.J. ; Greasley, Andrew. / A survey of continuous improvement practices in the United Kingdom and Mexico. Quality innovation knowledge: conderence proceedings : application and synthesis in the global economy. editor / Amrik Sohal ; Richard Cooney. 2005. pp. 125-130
@inproceedings{fdfaaf57dc5c461f8bb625578bb461a8,
title = "A survey of continuous improvement practices in the United Kingdom and Mexico",
abstract = "With the advent of globalisation companies all around the world must improve their performance in order to survive. The threats are coming from everywhere, and in different ways, such as low cost products, high quality products, new technologies, and new products. Different companies in different countries are using various techniques and using quality criteria items to strive for excellence. Continuous improvement techniques are used to enable companies to improve their operations. Therefore, companies are using techniques such as TQM, Kaizen, Six-Sigma, Lean Manufacturing, and quality award criteria items such as Customer Focus, Human Resources, Information & Analysis, and Process Management.The purpose of this paper is to compare the use of these techniques and criteria items in two countries, Mexico and the United Kingdom, which differ in culture and industrial structure. In terms of the use of continuous improvement tools and techniques, Mexico formally started to deal with continuous improvement by creating its National Quality Award soon after the Americans began the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The United Kingdom formally started by using the European Quality Award (EQA), modified and renamed as the EFQM Excellence Model.The methodology used in this study was to undertake a literature review of the subject matter and to study some general applications around the world. A questionnaire survey was then designed and a survey undertaken based on the same scale, about the same sample size, and the about the same industrial sector within the two countries. The survey presents a brief definition of each of the constructs to facilitate understanding of the questions. The analysis of the data was then conducted with the assistance of a statistical software package. The survey results indicate both similarities and differences in the strengths and weaknesses of the companies in the two countries. One outcome of the analysis is that it enables the companies to use the results to benchmark themselves and thus act to reinforce their strengths and to reduce their weaknesses.",
author = "Borges, {Luis A.J.} and Andrew Greasley",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
pages = "125--130",
editor = "Amrik Sohal and Richard Cooney",
booktitle = "Quality innovation knowledge",

}

Borges, LAJ & Greasley, A 2005, A survey of continuous improvement practices in the United Kingdom and Mexico. in A Sohal & R Cooney (eds), Quality innovation knowledge: conderence proceedings : application and synthesis in the global economy. pp. 125-130, 7th International Conference on Quality, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Kuala Lumpar, Malaysia, 16/02/05.

A survey of continuous improvement practices in the United Kingdom and Mexico. / Borges, Luis A.J.; Greasley, Andrew.

Quality innovation knowledge: conderence proceedings : application and synthesis in the global economy. ed. / Amrik Sohal; Richard Cooney. 2005. p. 125-130.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - A survey of continuous improvement practices in the United Kingdom and Mexico

AU - Borges, Luis A.J.

AU - Greasley, Andrew

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - With the advent of globalisation companies all around the world must improve their performance in order to survive. The threats are coming from everywhere, and in different ways, such as low cost products, high quality products, new technologies, and new products. Different companies in different countries are using various techniques and using quality criteria items to strive for excellence. Continuous improvement techniques are used to enable companies to improve their operations. Therefore, companies are using techniques such as TQM, Kaizen, Six-Sigma, Lean Manufacturing, and quality award criteria items such as Customer Focus, Human Resources, Information & Analysis, and Process Management.The purpose of this paper is to compare the use of these techniques and criteria items in two countries, Mexico and the United Kingdom, which differ in culture and industrial structure. In terms of the use of continuous improvement tools and techniques, Mexico formally started to deal with continuous improvement by creating its National Quality Award soon after the Americans began the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The United Kingdom formally started by using the European Quality Award (EQA), modified and renamed as the EFQM Excellence Model.The methodology used in this study was to undertake a literature review of the subject matter and to study some general applications around the world. A questionnaire survey was then designed and a survey undertaken based on the same scale, about the same sample size, and the about the same industrial sector within the two countries. The survey presents a brief definition of each of the constructs to facilitate understanding of the questions. The analysis of the data was then conducted with the assistance of a statistical software package. The survey results indicate both similarities and differences in the strengths and weaknesses of the companies in the two countries. One outcome of the analysis is that it enables the companies to use the results to benchmark themselves and thus act to reinforce their strengths and to reduce their weaknesses.

AB - With the advent of globalisation companies all around the world must improve their performance in order to survive. The threats are coming from everywhere, and in different ways, such as low cost products, high quality products, new technologies, and new products. Different companies in different countries are using various techniques and using quality criteria items to strive for excellence. Continuous improvement techniques are used to enable companies to improve their operations. Therefore, companies are using techniques such as TQM, Kaizen, Six-Sigma, Lean Manufacturing, and quality award criteria items such as Customer Focus, Human Resources, Information & Analysis, and Process Management.The purpose of this paper is to compare the use of these techniques and criteria items in two countries, Mexico and the United Kingdom, which differ in culture and industrial structure. In terms of the use of continuous improvement tools and techniques, Mexico formally started to deal with continuous improvement by creating its National Quality Award soon after the Americans began the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The United Kingdom formally started by using the European Quality Award (EQA), modified and renamed as the EFQM Excellence Model.The methodology used in this study was to undertake a literature review of the subject matter and to study some general applications around the world. A questionnaire survey was then designed and a survey undertaken based on the same scale, about the same sample size, and the about the same industrial sector within the two countries. The survey presents a brief definition of each of the constructs to facilitate understanding of the questions. The analysis of the data was then conducted with the assistance of a statistical software package. The survey results indicate both similarities and differences in the strengths and weaknesses of the companies in the two countries. One outcome of the analysis is that it enables the companies to use the results to benchmark themselves and thus act to reinforce their strengths and to reduce their weaknesses.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 125

EP - 130

BT - Quality innovation knowledge

A2 - Sohal, Amrik

A2 - Cooney, Richard

ER -

Borges LAJ, Greasley A. A survey of continuous improvement practices in the United Kingdom and Mexico. In Sohal A, Cooney R, editors, Quality innovation knowledge: conderence proceedings : application and synthesis in the global economy. 2005. p. 125-130