Abstract
The field of Semantic Web Services (SWS) has been recognized as one of the most promising areas of emergent research within the Semantic Web initiative, exhibiting an extensive commercial potential and attracting significant attention from both industry and the research community. Currently, there exist several different frameworks and languages for formally describing a Web Service: Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S), Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO) and Semantic Annotations for the Web Services Description Language (SAWSDL) are the most important approaches. To the inexperienced user, choosing the appropriate platform for a specific SWS application may prove to be challenging, given a lack of clear separation between the ideas promoted by the associated research communities. In this paper, we systematically compare OWL-S, WSMO and SAWSDL from various standpoints, namely, that of the service requester and provider as well as the broker-based view. The comparison is meant to help users to better understand the strengths and limitations of these different approaches to formalizing SWS, and to choose the most suitable solution for a given application.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4053-4072 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Concurrency and Computation |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 15 |
| Early online date | 21 May 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2015 |
Fingerprint
Bibliographical note
Special Issue: Combined Special Issues on Trust and security in wireless sensor networks and Semantics, knowledge and grids (SKG 2013).Keywords
- semantic web
- semantic web services
- semantic web service description language
Cite this
}
A survey of semantic web services formalisms. / Wang, Hai H.; Gibbins, Nick; Payne, Terry; Patelli, Alina; Wang, Yangang.
In: Concurrency and Computation, Vol. 27, No. 15, 10.2015, p. 4053-4072.Research output: Contribution to journal › Special issue
TY - JOUR
T1 - A survey of semantic web services formalisms
AU - Wang, Hai H.
AU - Gibbins, Nick
AU - Payne, Terry
AU - Patelli, Alina
AU - Wang, Yangang
N1 - Special Issue: Combined Special Issues on Trust and security in wireless sensor networks and Semantics, knowledge and grids (SKG 2013).
PY - 2015/10
Y1 - 2015/10
N2 - The field of Semantic Web Services (SWS) has been recognized as one of the most promising areas of emergent research within the Semantic Web initiative, exhibiting an extensive commercial potential and attracting significant attention from both industry and the research community. Currently, there exist several different frameworks and languages for formally describing a Web Service: Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S), Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO) and Semantic Annotations for the Web Services Description Language (SAWSDL) are the most important approaches. To the inexperienced user, choosing the appropriate platform for a specific SWS application may prove to be challenging, given a lack of clear separation between the ideas promoted by the associated research communities. In this paper, we systematically compare OWL-S, WSMO and SAWSDL from various standpoints, namely, that of the service requester and provider as well as the broker-based view. The comparison is meant to help users to better understand the strengths and limitations of these different approaches to formalizing SWS, and to choose the most suitable solution for a given application.
AB - The field of Semantic Web Services (SWS) has been recognized as one of the most promising areas of emergent research within the Semantic Web initiative, exhibiting an extensive commercial potential and attracting significant attention from both industry and the research community. Currently, there exist several different frameworks and languages for formally describing a Web Service: Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S), Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO) and Semantic Annotations for the Web Services Description Language (SAWSDL) are the most important approaches. To the inexperienced user, choosing the appropriate platform for a specific SWS application may prove to be challenging, given a lack of clear separation between the ideas promoted by the associated research communities. In this paper, we systematically compare OWL-S, WSMO and SAWSDL from various standpoints, namely, that of the service requester and provider as well as the broker-based view. The comparison is meant to help users to better understand the strengths and limitations of these different approaches to formalizing SWS, and to choose the most suitable solution for a given application.
KW - semantic web
KW - semantic web services
KW - semantic web service description language
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942686735&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cpe.3481
DO - 10.1002/cpe.3481
M3 - Special issue
AN - SCOPUS:84942686735
VL - 27
SP - 4053
EP - 4072
JO - Concurrency and Computation
JF - Concurrency and Computation
SN - 1532-0626
IS - 15
ER -