A veritable mix: veil-piercing with respect to a company in liquidation, confiscation orders and environmental pollution

Blanca Mamutse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examines the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Powell (Jacqueline) on whether the controlling directors/shareholders of an insolvent company, who had been convicted of offences connected with the wrongful disposal of controlled waste, could be found personally liable under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for the costs of cleaning up the company's polluted site, applying the Petrodel evasion principle on the piercing of the corporate veil.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-15
Number of pages3
JournalInsolvency Intelligence
Volume30
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

liquidation
environmental pollution
offense
shareholder
director
appeal
act
costs

Bibliographical note

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Insolvency Intelligence following peer review. The definitive published version Mamutse, B. (2017). A veritable mix: veil-piercing with respect to a company in liquidation, confiscation orders and environmental pollution. Insolvency Intelligence, 30(1), 13-15 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.

Keywords

  • environmental offences
  • confiscation orders
  • corporate personality
  • directors' liabilities
  • environmental remediation

Cite this

@article{df87d507d6ad4936bd6c26383e14ea67,
title = "A veritable mix: veil-piercing with respect to a company in liquidation, confiscation orders and environmental pollution",
abstract = "Examines the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Powell (Jacqueline) on whether the controlling directors/shareholders of an insolvent company, who had been convicted of offences connected with the wrongful disposal of controlled waste, could be found personally liable under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for the costs of cleaning up the company's polluted site, applying the Petrodel evasion principle on the piercing of the corporate veil.",
keywords = "environmental offences, confiscation orders, corporate personality, directors' liabilities, environmental remediation",
author = "Blanca Mamutse",
note = "This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Insolvency Intelligence following peer review. The definitive published version Mamutse, B. (2017). A veritable mix: veil-piercing with respect to a company in liquidation, confiscation orders and environmental pollution. Insolvency Intelligence, 30(1), 13-15 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "16",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "13--15",
journal = "Insolvency Intelligence",
issn = "0950-2645",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",
number = "1",

}

A veritable mix: veil-piercing with respect to a company in liquidation, confiscation orders and environmental pollution. / Mamutse, Blanca.

In: Insolvency Intelligence, Vol. 30, No. 1, 16.02.2017, p. 13-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A veritable mix: veil-piercing with respect to a company in liquidation, confiscation orders and environmental pollution

AU - Mamutse, Blanca

N1 - This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Insolvency Intelligence following peer review. The definitive published version Mamutse, B. (2017). A veritable mix: veil-piercing with respect to a company in liquidation, confiscation orders and environmental pollution. Insolvency Intelligence, 30(1), 13-15 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.

PY - 2017/2/16

Y1 - 2017/2/16

N2 - Examines the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Powell (Jacqueline) on whether the controlling directors/shareholders of an insolvent company, who had been convicted of offences connected with the wrongful disposal of controlled waste, could be found personally liable under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for the costs of cleaning up the company's polluted site, applying the Petrodel evasion principle on the piercing of the corporate veil.

AB - Examines the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Powell (Jacqueline) on whether the controlling directors/shareholders of an insolvent company, who had been convicted of offences connected with the wrongful disposal of controlled waste, could be found personally liable under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 for the costs of cleaning up the company's polluted site, applying the Petrodel evasion principle on the piercing of the corporate veil.

KW - environmental offences

KW - confiscation orders

KW - corporate personality

KW - directors' liabilities

KW - environmental remediation

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 13

EP - 15

JO - Insolvency Intelligence

JF - Insolvency Intelligence

SN - 0950-2645

IS - 1

ER -