Abstract
Informed by the neo-institutional perspective, this study seeks for the first time to investigate empirically the determinants of ISA adoption and commitment to harmonisation on a cross-national basis (89 countries). The findings show that the protection of minority interests, regulatory enforcement, lenders/borrowers rights, foreign aid, prevalence of foreign ownership, educational attainment and particular forms of political system (level of democracy) prevailing in a country, are observed to be significant predictors of the extent of commitment to the adoption and harmonisation of ISAs. Our statistical analysis therefore suggests that coercive, mimetic and normative pressure have a significant impact on ISA adoption relative to economic (efficiency-led) factors. Our findings imply that current efforts by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and other international agencies to implement ISAs need to recognise that a broad set of institutional factors, rather than narrow economic ones, are of relevance in the development of audit policymaking, practice and regulation worldwide.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 59-81 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | International Journal of Auditing |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 25 Dec 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- accounting
- International Standards on Auditing
- neo-institutional theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Adoption of International Standards on Auditing (ISA): Do Institutional Factors Matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver