Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


Widespread practice across the majority of branches of forensic science uses analytical methods based on human perception, and interpretive methods based on subjective judgement. These methods are non-transparent and are susceptible to cognitive bias, interpretation is often logically flawed, and forensic-evaluation systems are often not empirically validated. I describe a paradigm shift in which existing methods are replaced by methods based on relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models; methods that are transparent and reproducible, are intrinsically resistant to cognitive bias, use the logically correct framework for interpretation of evidence (the likelihood-ratio framework), and are empirically validated under casework conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100270
JournalForensic Science International: Synergy
Early online date18 May 2022
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Bibliographical note

© 2022 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license 4.0

Funding: This research was supported by Research England's Expanding Excellence in England Fund as part of funding for the Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics 2019–2023.


Dive into the research topics of 'Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this