Advancing the common good through business excellence awards: A legitimacy-seeking perspective

Shadrack Asante*, David Sarpong, Eunice Aidoo, Adekunle Isaac Ogunsade

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Competing for and winning business excellence awards (BEAs) is essential for firms' long-term performance. However, the role of these BEAs in inspiring good and generating sustainable business practices has often been overlooked. In this article, we draw on the legitimacy-seeking theory to explore the “socially good” transformations firms go through by competing for BEAs. Data for the inquiry come from semi-structured interviews with managers whose firms competed in two BEAs in the United Kingdom. Providing insight into BEAs as a competitive legitimating frame in organizing, our findings shed light on how BEAs may serve as competitive crucibles that provide opportunities for feedback and learning, potentiality for brand positioning, and a possibility for stimulating excellence in the adoption of good business practices. The implications of these findings for the theory and practice of advancing the “common good” are outlined.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalStrategic Change
Early online date1 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Data Access Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Keywords

  • brand positioning
  • business excellence awards
  • good business practices
  • legitimacy seeking
  • social validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advancing the common good through business excellence awards: A legitimacy-seeking perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this