Affective commitment within the public sector: antecedents and performance outcomes between ownership types

  • Ian R. Hodgkinson*
  • , Paul Hughes
  • , Zoe Radnor
  • , Russ Glennon
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

How to generate affective commitment and realize its performance potential is deemed critical to public management. But in the context of service outsourcing, does ownership type influence its antecedents and performance outcomes? Drawing on postal survey data for English leisure providers, we find training is an antecedent across public and private ownership types; performance appraisal is an antecedent for private ownership only; while performance-related pay carries an insignificant effect. Affective commitment holds business and customer performance outcomes for public ownership, but insignificant effects are observed for external ownership types. Implications of this contextual variation for public management theory are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1872-1895
Number of pages24
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • Affective commitment
  • antecedents
  • outcomes
  • ownership type
  • performance
  • performance appraisal
  • performance management
  • performance-related pay
  • training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Affective commitment within the public sector: antecedents and performance outcomes between ownership types'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this