Ambulatory electroencephalogram in children: a prospective clinical audit of 100 cases

Nahin Hussain, Neti Gayatri, A. Blake, L. Downey, Stefano Seri, William P. Whitehouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Ambulatory electroencephalogram has been used for differentiating epileptic from nonepileptic events, recording seizure frequency and classification of seizure type. We studied 100 consecutive children prospectively aged 11 days to 16 years that were referred for an ambulatory electroencephalogram to a regional children's hospital. Ambulatory electroencephalogram was clinically useful in contributing to a clinical diagnosis in 71% of children who were referred with a range of clinical questions. A diagnosis of epileptic disorder was confirmed by obtaining an ictal record in 26% and this included 11 children that had previously normal awake and or sleep electroencephalogram. We recommend making a telephone check of the current target event frequency and prioritising those with typical events on most days in order to improve the frequency of recording a typical attack.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-191
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Neurosciences
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2013

Bibliographical note

Protected under Indian and international copyrights. The Journal, however, grants to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, perform and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works in any digital medium for any reasonable non-commercial purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship and ownership of the rights. The journal also grants the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal non-commercial use under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ambulatory electroencephalogram in children: a prospective clinical audit of 100 cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this