'Animal electricity' in the long eighteenth century with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school

Christopher U.M. Smith

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Coleridge, looking back at the end of the ‘long eighteenth century’, remarked that the whole of natural philosophy had been ‘electrified’ by advances in the understanding of electrical phenomena. In this paper I trace the way in which these advances affected contemporary ‘neurophysiology.’ At the beginning of the long eighteenth century, neurophysiology (in spite of Swammerdam’s and Glisson’s demonstrations to the contrary) was still understood largely in terms of hollow nerves and animal spirits. At the end of that period the researches of microscopists and electricians had convinced most medical men that the old understanding had to be replaced. Walsh, Patterson, John Hunter and others had described the electric organs of electric fish. Gray and Nollet had demonstrated that electricity was not merely static, but flowed. Franklin had alerted the world to atmospheric electricity. Galvani’s frog experiments were widely known. Volta had invented his ‘pile.’ But did ‘animal electricity’ exist and was it identical to the electricity physicists studied in the inanimate world? Was the brain a gland, as Malpighi’s researches seemed to confirm., and did it secrete electricity into the nervous system? The Monros (primus and secundus), William Cullen, Luigi Galvani, Alessandro Volta, Erasmus Darwin, Luigi Rolando and François Baillarger all had their own ideas. This paper reviews these ‘long-eighteenth century’ controversies with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school and the interaction between neurophysiology and physics.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusIn preparation - 7 Jul 2005
EventTenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN) and Eleventh Meeting of the European Club for the History of Neurology (ECHN) - St. Andrews (UK)
Duration: 5 Jul 20059 Jul 2005

Other

OtherTenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN) and Eleventh Meeting of the European Club for the History of Neurology (ECHN)
CitySt. Andrews (UK)
Period5/07/059/07/05

Fingerprint

Electricity
Medical School
Edinburgh
Animals
Neurophysiology
Physics
John Hunter
Nerve
Fish
Nervous System
Interaction
Organs
Experiment
Frog
Erasmus Darwin
Natural philosophy
Physicists

Bibliographical note

Abstract published in Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 14(4):313-314, December 2005

Keywords

  • electrical phenomena
  • neurophysiology
  • electricity

Cite this

Smith, C. U. M. (2005). 'Animal electricity' in the long eighteenth century with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school. Paper presented at Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN) and Eleventh Meeting of the European Club for the History of Neurology (ECHN), St. Andrews (UK), .
Smith, Christopher U.M. / 'Animal electricity' in the long eighteenth century with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school. Paper presented at Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN) and Eleventh Meeting of the European Club for the History of Neurology (ECHN), St. Andrews (UK), .
@conference{15ffe38c07e44b3eaa5c586088cfab60,
title = "'Animal electricity' in the long eighteenth century with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school",
abstract = "Coleridge, looking back at the end of the ‘long eighteenth century’, remarked that the whole of natural philosophy had been ‘electrified’ by advances in the understanding of electrical phenomena. In this paper I trace the way in which these advances affected contemporary ‘neurophysiology.’ At the beginning of the long eighteenth century, neurophysiology (in spite of Swammerdam’s and Glisson’s demonstrations to the contrary) was still understood largely in terms of hollow nerves and animal spirits. At the end of that period the researches of microscopists and electricians had convinced most medical men that the old understanding had to be replaced. Walsh, Patterson, John Hunter and others had described the electric organs of electric fish. Gray and Nollet had demonstrated that electricity was not merely static, but flowed. Franklin had alerted the world to atmospheric electricity. Galvani’s frog experiments were widely known. Volta had invented his ‘pile.’ But did ‘animal electricity’ exist and was it identical to the electricity physicists studied in the inanimate world? Was the brain a gland, as Malpighi’s researches seemed to confirm., and did it secrete electricity into the nervous system? The Monros (primus and secundus), William Cullen, Luigi Galvani, Alessandro Volta, Erasmus Darwin, Luigi Rolando and Fran{\cc}ois Baillarger all had their own ideas. This paper reviews these ‘long-eighteenth century’ controversies with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school and the interaction between neurophysiology and physics.",
keywords = "electrical phenomena, neurophysiology, electricity",
author = "Smith, {Christopher U.M.}",
note = "Abstract published in Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 14(4):313-314, December 2005; Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN) and Eleventh Meeting of the European Club for the History of Neurology (ECHN) ; Conference date: 05-07-2005 Through 09-07-2005",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
day = "7",
language = "English",

}

Smith, CUM 2005, ''Animal electricity' in the long eighteenth century with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school' Paper presented at Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN) and Eleventh Meeting of the European Club for the History of Neurology (ECHN), St. Andrews (UK), 5/07/05 - 9/07/05, .

'Animal electricity' in the long eighteenth century with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school. / Smith, Christopher U.M.

2005. Paper presented at Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN) and Eleventh Meeting of the European Club for the History of Neurology (ECHN), St. Andrews (UK), .

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - 'Animal electricity' in the long eighteenth century with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school

AU - Smith, Christopher U.M.

N1 - Abstract published in Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 14(4):313-314, December 2005

PY - 2005/7/7

Y1 - 2005/7/7

N2 - Coleridge, looking back at the end of the ‘long eighteenth century’, remarked that the whole of natural philosophy had been ‘electrified’ by advances in the understanding of electrical phenomena. In this paper I trace the way in which these advances affected contemporary ‘neurophysiology.’ At the beginning of the long eighteenth century, neurophysiology (in spite of Swammerdam’s and Glisson’s demonstrations to the contrary) was still understood largely in terms of hollow nerves and animal spirits. At the end of that period the researches of microscopists and electricians had convinced most medical men that the old understanding had to be replaced. Walsh, Patterson, John Hunter and others had described the electric organs of electric fish. Gray and Nollet had demonstrated that electricity was not merely static, but flowed. Franklin had alerted the world to atmospheric electricity. Galvani’s frog experiments were widely known. Volta had invented his ‘pile.’ But did ‘animal electricity’ exist and was it identical to the electricity physicists studied in the inanimate world? Was the brain a gland, as Malpighi’s researches seemed to confirm., and did it secrete electricity into the nervous system? The Monros (primus and secundus), William Cullen, Luigi Galvani, Alessandro Volta, Erasmus Darwin, Luigi Rolando and François Baillarger all had their own ideas. This paper reviews these ‘long-eighteenth century’ controversies with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school and the interaction between neurophysiology and physics.

AB - Coleridge, looking back at the end of the ‘long eighteenth century’, remarked that the whole of natural philosophy had been ‘electrified’ by advances in the understanding of electrical phenomena. In this paper I trace the way in which these advances affected contemporary ‘neurophysiology.’ At the beginning of the long eighteenth century, neurophysiology (in spite of Swammerdam’s and Glisson’s demonstrations to the contrary) was still understood largely in terms of hollow nerves and animal spirits. At the end of that period the researches of microscopists and electricians had convinced most medical men that the old understanding had to be replaced. Walsh, Patterson, John Hunter and others had described the electric organs of electric fish. Gray and Nollet had demonstrated that electricity was not merely static, but flowed. Franklin had alerted the world to atmospheric electricity. Galvani’s frog experiments were widely known. Volta had invented his ‘pile.’ But did ‘animal electricity’ exist and was it identical to the electricity physicists studied in the inanimate world? Was the brain a gland, as Malpighi’s researches seemed to confirm., and did it secrete electricity into the nervous system? The Monros (primus and secundus), William Cullen, Luigi Galvani, Alessandro Volta, Erasmus Darwin, Luigi Rolando and François Baillarger all had their own ideas. This paper reviews these ‘long-eighteenth century’ controversies with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school and the interaction between neurophysiology and physics.

KW - electrical phenomena

KW - neurophysiology

KW - electricity

UR - http://www.bri.ucla.edu/nha/ishn/ab26-2005.htm

M3 - Paper

ER -

Smith CUM. 'Animal electricity' in the long eighteenth century with special reference to the Edinburgh medical school. 2005. Paper presented at Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN) and Eleventh Meeting of the European Club for the History of Neurology (ECHN), St. Andrews (UK), .