Antibodies against the node of Ranvier: a real-life evaluation of incidence, clinical features and response to treatment based on a prospective analysis of 1500 sera

Emilien Delmont*, Alexandre Brodovitch, Ludivine Kouton, Thibaut Allou, Stéphane Beltran, Marion Brisset, Jean Philippe Camdessanché, Cécile Cauquil, Jonathan Cirion, Thierry Dubard, Andoni Echaniz-Laguna, Aude Marie Grapperon, Joëlle Jauffret, Raul Juntas-Morales, Laurent Daniel Kremer, Thierry Kuntzer, Céline Labeyrie, Lucas Lanfranco, Thierry Maisonobe, Nicolas MavroudakisSylvie Mecharles-Darrigol, Guillaume Nicolas, Jean Baptiste Noury, Maud Perie, Yusuf A. Rajabally, Gauthier Remiche, Violaine Rouaud, Céline Tard, Emmanuelle Salort-Campana, Annie Verschueren, Karine Viala, Adrien Wang, Shahram Attarian, José Boucraut

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

100 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Introduction: IgG4 antibodies against neurofascin (Nfasc155 and Nfasc140/186), contactin (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein (Caspr1) are described in specific subtypes of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Our objective was to assess, in a real-life practice, the incidence, the clinical features and the response to treatment of these forms of CIDP. Methods: 1500 sera of patients suspected of having CIDP from France, Belgium and Switzerland were prospectively tested using a flow cytometry technique. The characteristics of patients with antibodies against the node of Ranvier were compared to 100 seronegative CIDP from our department. Results: IgG4 antibodies against Nfasc155, CNTN1, and Caspr1 were, respectively, detected in 15 (prevalence 1%), 10 (0.7%) and 2 (0.2%) sera. Antibodies specific of the Nfasc140/186 were not detected. All subjects with antibodies against the node of Ranvier fulfilled diagnostic criteria for CIDP. CIDP with anti-Nfasc155 were younger, had more sensory ataxia and postural tremor than seronegative CIDP. CIDP with anti-CNTN1 had more frequent subacute onset and facial paralysis, commoner renal involvement with membranous glomerulonephritis and greater disability, than seronegative CIDP. CIDP with anti-Caspr1 had more frequent respiratory failure and cranial nerve involvement but not more neuropathic pain than seronegative CIDP. Intravenous immunoglobulins were ineffective in most seropositive patients. Rituximab produced dramatic improvement in disability and decreased antibodies titres in 13 seropositive patients (8 with anti-Nfasc155 and 5 with anti-CNTN1 antibodies). Conclusions: Although rare, anti-paranodal antibodies are clinically valuable, because they are associated with specific phenotypes and therapeutic response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3664-3672
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of neurology
Volume267
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Caspr1
  • CIDP
  • Contactin
  • Neurofascin 140/186
  • Neurofascin 155
  • Node of Ranvier

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antibodies against the node of Ranvier: a real-life evaluation of incidence, clinical features and response to treatment based on a prospective analysis of 1500 sera'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this