Applicability of contact angle techniques used in the analysis of contact lenses, part 1: comparative methodologies

Darren Campbell*, Sarah Carnell, Russell Eden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objectives and Methods: Contact angle, as a representative measure of surface wettability, is often employed to interpret contact lens surface properties. The literature is often contradictory and can lead to confusion. This literature review is part of a series regarding the analysis of hydrogel contact lenses using contact angle techniques. Here we present an overview of contact angle terminology, methodology, and analysis. Having discussed this background material, subsequent parts of the series will discuss the analysis of contact lens contact angles and evaluate differences in published laboratory results. Results: The concepts of contact angle, wettability and wetting are presented as an introduction. Contact angle hysteresis is outlined and highlights the advantages in using dynamic analytical techniques over static methods. The surface free energy of a material illustrates how contact angle analysis is capable of providing supplementary surface characterization. Although single values are able to distinguish individual material differences, surface free energy and dynamic methods provide an improved understanding of material behavior. The frequently used sessile drop, captive bubble, and Wilhelmy plate techniques are discussed. Their use as both dynamic and static methods, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, is explained. Conclusions: No single contact angle technique fully characterizes the wettability of a material surface, and the application of complimenting methods allows increased characterization. At present, there is not an ISO standard method designed for soft materials. It is important that each contact angle technique has a standard protocol, as small protocol differences between laboratories often contribute to a variety of published data that are not easily comparable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-262
Number of pages9
JournalEye and Contact Lens
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2013

Fingerprint

Contact Lenses
Wettability
Confusion
Surface Properties
Hydrogel
Terminology
Individuality

Keywords

  • contact angle
  • contact lens
  • hydrogel
  • methodology
  • wettability

Cite this

Campbell, Darren ; Carnell, Sarah ; Eden, Russell. / Applicability of contact angle techniques used in the analysis of contact lenses, part 1 : comparative methodologies. In: Eye and Contact Lens. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 254-262.
@article{31b0bdee07164bc9a2f43992c3319dc4,
title = "Applicability of contact angle techniques used in the analysis of contact lenses, part 1: comparative methodologies",
abstract = "Objectives and Methods: Contact angle, as a representative measure of surface wettability, is often employed to interpret contact lens surface properties. The literature is often contradictory and can lead to confusion. This literature review is part of a series regarding the analysis of hydrogel contact lenses using contact angle techniques. Here we present an overview of contact angle terminology, methodology, and analysis. Having discussed this background material, subsequent parts of the series will discuss the analysis of contact lens contact angles and evaluate differences in published laboratory results. Results: The concepts of contact angle, wettability and wetting are presented as an introduction. Contact angle hysteresis is outlined and highlights the advantages in using dynamic analytical techniques over static methods. The surface free energy of a material illustrates how contact angle analysis is capable of providing supplementary surface characterization. Although single values are able to distinguish individual material differences, surface free energy and dynamic methods provide an improved understanding of material behavior. The frequently used sessile drop, captive bubble, and Wilhelmy plate techniques are discussed. Their use as both dynamic and static methods, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, is explained. Conclusions: No single contact angle technique fully characterizes the wettability of a material surface, and the application of complimenting methods allows increased characterization. At present, there is not an ISO standard method designed for soft materials. It is important that each contact angle technique has a standard protocol, as small protocol differences between laboratories often contribute to a variety of published data that are not easily comparable.",
keywords = "contact angle, contact lens, hydrogel, methodology, wettability",
author = "Darren Campbell and Sarah Carnell and Russell Eden",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1097/ICL.0b013e31828ca174",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "254--262",
journal = "Eye and Contact Lens",
issn = "1542-2321",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Applicability of contact angle techniques used in the analysis of contact lenses, part 1 : comparative methodologies. / Campbell, Darren; Carnell, Sarah; Eden, Russell.

In: Eye and Contact Lens, Vol. 39, No. 3, 11.05.2013, p. 254-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applicability of contact angle techniques used in the analysis of contact lenses, part 1

T2 - comparative methodologies

AU - Campbell, Darren

AU - Carnell, Sarah

AU - Eden, Russell

PY - 2013/5/11

Y1 - 2013/5/11

N2 - Objectives and Methods: Contact angle, as a representative measure of surface wettability, is often employed to interpret contact lens surface properties. The literature is often contradictory and can lead to confusion. This literature review is part of a series regarding the analysis of hydrogel contact lenses using contact angle techniques. Here we present an overview of contact angle terminology, methodology, and analysis. Having discussed this background material, subsequent parts of the series will discuss the analysis of contact lens contact angles and evaluate differences in published laboratory results. Results: The concepts of contact angle, wettability and wetting are presented as an introduction. Contact angle hysteresis is outlined and highlights the advantages in using dynamic analytical techniques over static methods. The surface free energy of a material illustrates how contact angle analysis is capable of providing supplementary surface characterization. Although single values are able to distinguish individual material differences, surface free energy and dynamic methods provide an improved understanding of material behavior. The frequently used sessile drop, captive bubble, and Wilhelmy plate techniques are discussed. Their use as both dynamic and static methods, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, is explained. Conclusions: No single contact angle technique fully characterizes the wettability of a material surface, and the application of complimenting methods allows increased characterization. At present, there is not an ISO standard method designed for soft materials. It is important that each contact angle technique has a standard protocol, as small protocol differences between laboratories often contribute to a variety of published data that are not easily comparable.

AB - Objectives and Methods: Contact angle, as a representative measure of surface wettability, is often employed to interpret contact lens surface properties. The literature is often contradictory and can lead to confusion. This literature review is part of a series regarding the analysis of hydrogel contact lenses using contact angle techniques. Here we present an overview of contact angle terminology, methodology, and analysis. Having discussed this background material, subsequent parts of the series will discuss the analysis of contact lens contact angles and evaluate differences in published laboratory results. Results: The concepts of contact angle, wettability and wetting are presented as an introduction. Contact angle hysteresis is outlined and highlights the advantages in using dynamic analytical techniques over static methods. The surface free energy of a material illustrates how contact angle analysis is capable of providing supplementary surface characterization. Although single values are able to distinguish individual material differences, surface free energy and dynamic methods provide an improved understanding of material behavior. The frequently used sessile drop, captive bubble, and Wilhelmy plate techniques are discussed. Their use as both dynamic and static methods, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, is explained. Conclusions: No single contact angle technique fully characterizes the wettability of a material surface, and the application of complimenting methods allows increased characterization. At present, there is not an ISO standard method designed for soft materials. It is important that each contact angle technique has a standard protocol, as small protocol differences between laboratories often contribute to a variety of published data that are not easily comparable.

KW - contact angle

KW - contact lens

KW - hydrogel

KW - methodology

KW - wettability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877693794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://journals.lww.com/claojournal/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2013&issue=05000&article=00010&type=abstract

U2 - 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31828ca174

DO - 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31828ca174

M3 - Review article

C2 - 23584047

AN - SCOPUS:84877693794

VL - 39

SP - 254

EP - 262

JO - Eye and Contact Lens

JF - Eye and Contact Lens

SN - 1542-2321

IS - 3

ER -