Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates diversity in the activity of authorship and the corresponding diversity of forensic authorship analysis questions and techniques. Authorship is discussed in terms of Love’s (2002) multifunctional description of precursory, executive, declarative and revisionary authorship activities and the implications of this distinction for forensic problem solving. Four different authorship questions are considered. These are ‘How was the text produced?’, ‘How many people wrote the text?’, ‘What kind of person wrote the text?’ and ‘What is the relationship of a queried text with comparison texts?’ Different approaches to forensic authorship analysis are discussed in terms of their appropriateness to answering different authorship questions. The conclusion drawn is that no one technique will ever be appropriate to all problems.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationDimensions of Forensic Linguistics
EditorsJohn Gibbons, M. Teresa Turell
Place of PublicationAmsterdam (NL)
PublisherJohn Benjamins
Number of pages316
ISBN (Print)9789027205216
Publication statusPublished - 21 Nov 2008

Fingerprint

love
human being

Keywords

  • authorship
  • forensic authorship
  • forensic problem solving
  • forensic authorship analysis

Cite this

Grant, T. D. (2008). Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis. In J. Gibbons, & M. T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics Amsterdam (NL): John Benjamins.
Grant, Tim D. / Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis. Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. editor / John Gibbons ; M. Teresa Turell. Amsterdam (NL) : John Benjamins, 2008.
@inbook{81a4470546304f8a94fe645e440f98b8,
title = "Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis",
abstract = "This chapter demonstrates diversity in the activity of authorship and the corresponding diversity of forensic authorship analysis questions and techniques. Authorship is discussed in terms of Love’s (2002) multifunctional description of precursory, executive, declarative and revisionary authorship activities and the implications of this distinction for forensic problem solving. Four different authorship questions are considered. These are ‘How was the text produced?’, ‘How many people wrote the text?’, ‘What kind of person wrote the text?’ and ‘What is the relationship of a queried text with comparison texts?’ Different approaches to forensic authorship analysis are discussed in terms of their appropriateness to answering different authorship questions. The conclusion drawn is that no one technique will ever be appropriate to all problems.",
keywords = "authorship, forensic authorship, forensic problem solving, forensic authorship analysis",
author = "Grant, {Tim D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "21",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789027205216",
editor = "John Gibbons and Turell, {M. Teresa}",
booktitle = "Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics",
publisher = "John Benjamins",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Grant, TD 2008, Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis. in J Gibbons & MT Turell (eds), Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (NL).

Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis. / Grant, Tim D.

Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. ed. / John Gibbons; M. Teresa Turell. Amsterdam (NL) : John Benjamins, 2008.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis

AU - Grant, Tim D.

PY - 2008/11/21

Y1 - 2008/11/21

N2 - This chapter demonstrates diversity in the activity of authorship and the corresponding diversity of forensic authorship analysis questions and techniques. Authorship is discussed in terms of Love’s (2002) multifunctional description of precursory, executive, declarative and revisionary authorship activities and the implications of this distinction for forensic problem solving. Four different authorship questions are considered. These are ‘How was the text produced?’, ‘How many people wrote the text?’, ‘What kind of person wrote the text?’ and ‘What is the relationship of a queried text with comparison texts?’ Different approaches to forensic authorship analysis are discussed in terms of their appropriateness to answering different authorship questions. The conclusion drawn is that no one technique will ever be appropriate to all problems.

AB - This chapter demonstrates diversity in the activity of authorship and the corresponding diversity of forensic authorship analysis questions and techniques. Authorship is discussed in terms of Love’s (2002) multifunctional description of precursory, executive, declarative and revisionary authorship activities and the implications of this distinction for forensic problem solving. Four different authorship questions are considered. These are ‘How was the text produced?’, ‘How many people wrote the text?’, ‘What kind of person wrote the text?’ and ‘What is the relationship of a queried text with comparison texts?’ Different approaches to forensic authorship analysis are discussed in terms of their appropriateness to answering different authorship questions. The conclusion drawn is that no one technique will ever be appropriate to all problems.

KW - authorship

KW - forensic authorship

KW - forensic problem solving

KW - forensic authorship analysis

UR - http://www.benjamins.com/cgi-bin/t_articles.cgi?bookid=AALS%205&artid=27119269

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789027205216

BT - Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics

A2 - Gibbons, John

A2 - Turell, M. Teresa

PB - John Benjamins

CY - Amsterdam (NL)

ER -

Grant TD. Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis. In Gibbons J, Turell MT, editors, Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam (NL): John Benjamins. 2008