Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are we mis-estimating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy? Analysis of assessment methodologies from a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy

  • Alex Molassiotis*
  • , Hui Lin Cheng
  • , Violeta Lopez
  • , Joseph S.K. Au
  • , Alexandre Chan
  • , Aishwarya Bandla
  • , K. T. Leung
  • , Y. C. Li
  • , K. H. Wong
  • , Lorna K.P. Suen
  • , Choi Wan Chan
  • , Janelle Yorke
  • , Carole Farrell
  • , Raghav Sundar
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
  • Hong Kong Adventist Hospital
  • National University of Singapore
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Hong Kong
  • Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health
  • National University Health System

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

191   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: There are inconsistencies in the literature regarding the prevalence and assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). This study explored CIPN natural history and its characteristics in patients receiving taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy. 

Patients and methods: Multi-country multisite prospective longitudinal observational study. Patients were assessed before commencing and three weekly during chemotherapy for up to six cycles, and at 6,9, and 12 months using clinician-based scales (NCI-CTCAE; WHO-CIPN criterion), objective assessments (cotton wool test;10 g monofilament); patient-reported outcome measures (FACT/GOG-Ntx; EORTC-CIPN20), and Nerve Conduction Studies. 

Results: In total, 343 patients were recruited in the cohort, providing 2399 observations. There was wide variation in CIPN prevalence rates using different assessments (14.2-53.4%). Prevalence of sensory neuropathy (and associated symptom profile) was also different in each type of chemotherapy, with paclitaxel (up to 63%) and oxaliplatin (up to 71.4%) showing the highest CIPN rates in most assessments and a more complex symptom profile. Peak prevalence was around the 6-month assessment (up to 71.4%). Motor neurotoxicity was common, particularly in the docetaxel subgroup (up to 22.1%; detected by NCI-CTCAE). There were relatively moderately-to-low correlations between scales (r s = 0.15,p < 0.05-r s = 0.48 p < 0.001), suggesting that they measure different neurotoxicity aspects from each other. Cumulative chemotherapy dose was not associated with onset and course of CIPN. 

Conclusion: The historical variation reported in CIPN incidence and prevalence is possibly confounded by disagreement between assessment modalities. Clinical practice should consider assessment of motor neuropathy for neurotoxic chemotherapy. Current scales may not be all appropriate to measure CIPN in a valid way, and a combination of scales are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number132
Number of pages19
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Cancer
  • Chemotherapy
  • Neurotoxicity
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Platins
  • Taxanes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are we mis-estimating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy? Analysis of assessment methodologies from a prospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this