BAC chromosomal microarray for prenatal detection of chromosome anomalies in fetal ultrasound anomalies: An economic evaluation

Sarah C. Hillman, Pelham M. Barton, Tracy E. Roberts, Eamonn R. Maher, Dominic M. Mcmullan, Mark D. Kilby*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: To determine the cost-effectiveness of prenatal chromosomal microarray (CMA) when performed for structural anomalies on fetal ultrasound scan over conventional techniques. Method: A decision tree was populated using data from a prospective cohort of women undergoing testing when a fetal ultrasound scan showed a structural abnormality. Nine strategies of testing were modeled including combinations of the tests: QFPCR, G-band karyotyping, CMA and FISH for DiGeorge (22q) microdeletion. Results: When CMA costs GBP 405 and using a 1-Mb BAC array it would cost GBP 24,600 for every additional case detected by CMA over a combination of QFPCR, followed by G-band karyotype, followed lastly by FISH (for DiGeorge syndrome). If CMA is performed instead of conventional karyotyping alone it costs GBP 33,000 for every additional case detected. However, if the cost of CMA is reduced to GBP 360 than when CMA is performed instead of conventional karyotyping alone it would cost GBP 9,768 for every additional case detected. Discussion: The use of a prenatal BAC CMA is not currently cost-effective when compared to other testing strategies. However, as CMA costs decrease and resolution (and detection rates) increase it is likely to become the cost-effective option of the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-58
Number of pages10
JournalFetal diagnosis and therapy
Volume36
Issue number1
Early online date13 Jun 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

Keywords

  • Chromosomal microarray
  • Economic evaluation
  • Fetal anomaly
  • Ultrasound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'BAC chromosomal microarray for prenatal detection of chromosome anomalies in fetal ultrasound anomalies: An economic evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this