Barriers to the use of e-health technology in nurse practitioner-patient consultations

Ann E. Adams*, Rachel Adams, Margaret Thorogood, Christopher Buckingham

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This paper examines primary care nurse practitioners' (NPs) use of information available via e-health technology (EHT) within consultations. It explores which information resources NPs use in clinical decision making, their comparative use of electronic versus paper-based and human information resources, the reasons behind their choices and how the use of different resources impacts on patient interactions. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were under-taken with 12 NPs recruited from 11 different general practitioner (GP) practices and five primary care trusts (PCTs) within the West Midlands South Strategic Health Authority, UK. Findings: The key finding was that for NPs an effective information resource is one that provides sufficient information, to generate a patient management plan rapidly. Speed, familiarity and trust are vital ingredients for regular use. Paper-based information resources therefore retain a significant role, and together with human information resources are still more frequently used than most electronic, and particularly web-based, resources. The latter are not yet well established within the context of patient consultations. Electronic clinical support, systems (such as Mentor, PRODIGY) and GPnotebook) are regularly used, however, because they are often linked electronically to patient records, and generate brief information, in a form accessible to both nurses and patients. By contrast, searching, for information from web-based resources was considered time-consuming, technically difficult and disruptive to patients. All NPs reported some negative effects on patients of using computers: mostly disrupted rapport and longer consultations. However, the majority had developed ways of working to, overcome these difficulties and that helped them to maintain, their patient-centred focus. Conclusions: Study NPs had receivcdl only very limited information technology (IT) training, but nevertheless were enthusiastic about computer use. This suggests that with further training they could adapt their practice to embrace more EHT, which would enhance their ability to be more autonomous and to base their practice on sound clinical evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-109
Number of pages7
JournalInformatics in Primary Care
Volume15
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 20 Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Biomedical Technology
Nurse Practitioners
Referral and Consultation
Primary Health Care
Mentors
Aptitude
General Practice
General Practitioners
Nurses
Interviews
Technology
Health

Keywords

  • Electronic information
  • Information resources
  • Nurse practitioners

Cite this

Adams, Ann E. ; Adams, Rachel ; Thorogood, Margaret ; Buckingham, Christopher. / Barriers to the use of e-health technology in nurse practitioner-patient consultations. In: Informatics in Primary Care. 2007 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 103-109.
@article{7fc1e8e803824760b18d17e020e8c4ee,
title = "Barriers to the use of e-health technology in nurse practitioner-patient consultations",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper examines primary care nurse practitioners' (NPs) use of information available via e-health technology (EHT) within consultations. It explores which information resources NPs use in clinical decision making, their comparative use of electronic versus paper-based and human information resources, the reasons behind their choices and how the use of different resources impacts on patient interactions. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were under-taken with 12 NPs recruited from 11 different general practitioner (GP) practices and five primary care trusts (PCTs) within the West Midlands South Strategic Health Authority, UK. Findings: The key finding was that for NPs an effective information resource is one that provides sufficient information, to generate a patient management plan rapidly. Speed, familiarity and trust are vital ingredients for regular use. Paper-based information resources therefore retain a significant role, and together with human information resources are still more frequently used than most electronic, and particularly web-based, resources. The latter are not yet well established within the context of patient consultations. Electronic clinical support, systems (such as Mentor, PRODIGY) and GPnotebook) are regularly used, however, because they are often linked electronically to patient records, and generate brief information, in a form accessible to both nurses and patients. By contrast, searching, for information from web-based resources was considered time-consuming, technically difficult and disruptive to patients. All NPs reported some negative effects on patients of using computers: mostly disrupted rapport and longer consultations. However, the majority had developed ways of working to, overcome these difficulties and that helped them to maintain, their patient-centred focus. Conclusions: Study NPs had receivcdl only very limited information technology (IT) training, but nevertheless were enthusiastic about computer use. This suggests that with further training they could adapt their practice to embrace more EHT, which would enhance their ability to be more autonomous and to base their practice on sound clinical evidence.",
keywords = "Electronic information, Information resources, Nurse practitioners",
author = "Adams, {Ann E.} and Rachel Adams and Margaret Thorogood and Christopher Buckingham",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "20",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "103--109",
journal = "Informatics in Primary Care",
issn = "1476-0320",
publisher = "BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT",
number = "2",

}

Barriers to the use of e-health technology in nurse practitioner-patient consultations. / Adams, Ann E.; Adams, Rachel; Thorogood, Margaret; Buckingham, Christopher.

In: Informatics in Primary Care, Vol. 15, No. 2, 20.08.2007, p. 103-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to the use of e-health technology in nurse practitioner-patient consultations

AU - Adams, Ann E.

AU - Adams, Rachel

AU - Thorogood, Margaret

AU - Buckingham, Christopher

PY - 2007/8/20

Y1 - 2007/8/20

N2 - Purpose: This paper examines primary care nurse practitioners' (NPs) use of information available via e-health technology (EHT) within consultations. It explores which information resources NPs use in clinical decision making, their comparative use of electronic versus paper-based and human information resources, the reasons behind their choices and how the use of different resources impacts on patient interactions. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were under-taken with 12 NPs recruited from 11 different general practitioner (GP) practices and five primary care trusts (PCTs) within the West Midlands South Strategic Health Authority, UK. Findings: The key finding was that for NPs an effective information resource is one that provides sufficient information, to generate a patient management plan rapidly. Speed, familiarity and trust are vital ingredients for regular use. Paper-based information resources therefore retain a significant role, and together with human information resources are still more frequently used than most electronic, and particularly web-based, resources. The latter are not yet well established within the context of patient consultations. Electronic clinical support, systems (such as Mentor, PRODIGY) and GPnotebook) are regularly used, however, because they are often linked electronically to patient records, and generate brief information, in a form accessible to both nurses and patients. By contrast, searching, for information from web-based resources was considered time-consuming, technically difficult and disruptive to patients. All NPs reported some negative effects on patients of using computers: mostly disrupted rapport and longer consultations. However, the majority had developed ways of working to, overcome these difficulties and that helped them to maintain, their patient-centred focus. Conclusions: Study NPs had receivcdl only very limited information technology (IT) training, but nevertheless were enthusiastic about computer use. This suggests that with further training they could adapt their practice to embrace more EHT, which would enhance their ability to be more autonomous and to base their practice on sound clinical evidence.

AB - Purpose: This paper examines primary care nurse practitioners' (NPs) use of information available via e-health technology (EHT) within consultations. It explores which information resources NPs use in clinical decision making, their comparative use of electronic versus paper-based and human information resources, the reasons behind their choices and how the use of different resources impacts on patient interactions. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were under-taken with 12 NPs recruited from 11 different general practitioner (GP) practices and five primary care trusts (PCTs) within the West Midlands South Strategic Health Authority, UK. Findings: The key finding was that for NPs an effective information resource is one that provides sufficient information, to generate a patient management plan rapidly. Speed, familiarity and trust are vital ingredients for regular use. Paper-based information resources therefore retain a significant role, and together with human information resources are still more frequently used than most electronic, and particularly web-based, resources. The latter are not yet well established within the context of patient consultations. Electronic clinical support, systems (such as Mentor, PRODIGY) and GPnotebook) are regularly used, however, because they are often linked electronically to patient records, and generate brief information, in a form accessible to both nurses and patients. By contrast, searching, for information from web-based resources was considered time-consuming, technically difficult and disruptive to patients. All NPs reported some negative effects on patients of using computers: mostly disrupted rapport and longer consultations. However, the majority had developed ways of working to, overcome these difficulties and that helped them to maintain, their patient-centred focus. Conclusions: Study NPs had receivcdl only very limited information technology (IT) training, but nevertheless were enthusiastic about computer use. This suggests that with further training they could adapt their practice to embrace more EHT, which would enhance their ability to be more autonomous and to base their practice on sound clinical evidence.

KW - Electronic information

KW - Information resources

KW - Nurse practitioners

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547871630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/648

M3 - Article

C2 - 17877872

AN - SCOPUS:34547871630

VL - 15

SP - 103

EP - 109

JO - Informatics in Primary Care

JF - Informatics in Primary Care

SN - 1476-0320

IS - 2

ER -