Benchmarking the n-tuple classifier with statlog dataset

Richard Rohwer, Michal Morciniec

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    The n-tuple recognition method was tested on 11 large real-world data sets and its performance compared to 23 other classification algorithms. On 7 of these, the results show no systematic performance gap between the n-tuple method and the others. Evidence was found to support a possible explanation for why the n-tuple method yields poor results for certain datasets. Preliminary empirical results of a study of the confidence interval (the difference between the two highest scores) are also reported. These suggest a counter-intuitive correlation between the confidence interval distribution and the overall classification performance of the system.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the Second Weightless Neural Network Workshop 1995, Computing with Logical Neurons
    EditorsD. L. Bisset
    Place of PublicationCanterbury
    PublisherUniversity of Kent
    Pages29-34
    Number of pages6
    Publication statusPublished - 1995

    Keywords

    • n-tuple recognition
    • algorithms
    • datasets

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Benchmarking the n-tuple classifier with statlog dataset'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this