Abstract
The aim of this article is to review and critically analyse the English law relating to
common intention constructive trusts in the context of the family home. In particular, it
seeks to show how the English courts have addressed the question of establishing and
quantifying the parties’ beneficial shares in both sole and joint ownership cases. The
writers also seek to compare the English approach with the way in which such questions have been answered by the Australian courts. The primary purpose of this
comparison is to consider what lessons (if any) can be learnt from the Australian model.
common intention constructive trusts in the context of the family home. In particular, it
seeks to show how the English courts have addressed the question of establishing and
quantifying the parties’ beneficial shares in both sole and joint ownership cases. The
writers also seek to compare the English approach with the way in which such questions have been answered by the Australian courts. The primary purpose of this
comparison is to consider what lessons (if any) can be learnt from the Australian model.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 151-173 |
| Journal | Denning Law Journal |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2021 |
Bibliographical note
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beneficial Ownership of the Family Home: A Comparative Study of English and Australian Constructive Trusts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver