Benefits from competition: some illustrative UK cases

Stephen Davies, Heather Coles, Matthew Olczak, Christopher Pike, Christopher Wilson

Research output: Working paperTechnical report

Abstract

This study provides a powerful demonstration of the real world impact of increasedcompetition. By presenting six market case studies drawn from a variety of sectors itgives evidence of the type and magnitude of the benefits following marketinterventions to develop competition and free up the operation of these sectors.
In discussing the types and form such interventions take, whether competition policy,deregulation or liberalisation, this report explores market conditions before and afterintervention, paying careful attention to both the envisaged benefits and the potentialfor negative side effects. Overall, the evidence suggests these benefits materialised,and in a number of instances proved more sizeable than anticipated. Concerns aboutharmful side effects have proved unfounded, with market stimuli impacting not only onthe price and range of goods available but also acting as a motivating force to productand process innovation.
As Professor Davies points out, although active competition policy proves an importantcomponent in the competitive process, it is not sufficient in its own right. In order todeliver greater productivity, of which competition is a key driver, the UK needs a pool of resourceful entrepreneurs able to exploit changing market conditions. In order togive these people the best chance of success the framework conditions need to becorrect with strength in the complementary capabilities of innovation, investment, skillsand enterprise.
Ensuring the competition framework is world class is central to the DTI’s strategy. The most recent peer review of the UK competition regime demonstrates that the UK isa strong performer, ranked third in the 2004 study, with the US first and Germanysecond. This study provides further evidence of the important role played by thatframework in delivering tangible benefits to consumers.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages104
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

Publication series

NameDTI economics paper
Volume9

Fingerprint

Market conditions
Competition policy
Side effects
Innovation
Peer review
Liberalization
Entrepreneurs
Process innovation
Deregulation
Productivity

Bibliographical note

© Crown Copyright.

Cite this

Davies, S., Coles, H., Olczak, M., Pike, C., & Wilson, C. (2004). Benefits from competition: some illustrative UK cases. (DTI economics paper; Vol. 9).
Davies, Stephen ; Coles, Heather ; Olczak, Matthew ; Pike, Christopher ; Wilson, Christopher. / Benefits from competition : some illustrative UK cases. 2004. (DTI economics paper).
@techreport{29e541ad499f49a1abb8dcaf78a5ba63,
title = "Benefits from competition: some illustrative UK cases",
abstract = "This study provides a powerful demonstration of the real world impact of increasedcompetition. By presenting six market case studies drawn from a variety of sectors itgives evidence of the type and magnitude of the benefits following marketinterventions to develop competition and free up the operation of these sectors.In discussing the types and form such interventions take, whether competition policy,deregulation or liberalisation, this report explores market conditions before and afterintervention, paying careful attention to both the envisaged benefits and the potentialfor negative side effects. Overall, the evidence suggests these benefits materialised,and in a number of instances proved more sizeable than anticipated. Concerns aboutharmful side effects have proved unfounded, with market stimuli impacting not only onthe price and range of goods available but also acting as a motivating force to productand process innovation.As Professor Davies points out, although active competition policy proves an importantcomponent in the competitive process, it is not sufficient in its own right. In order todeliver greater productivity, of which competition is a key driver, the UK needs a pool of resourceful entrepreneurs able to exploit changing market conditions. In order togive these people the best chance of success the framework conditions need to becorrect with strength in the complementary capabilities of innovation, investment, skillsand enterprise.Ensuring the competition framework is world class is central to the DTI’s strategy. The most recent peer review of the UK competition regime demonstrates that the UK isa strong performer, ranked third in the 2004 study, with the US first and Germanysecond. This study provides further evidence of the important role played by thatframework in delivering tangible benefits to consumers.",
author = "Stephen Davies and Heather Coles and Matthew Olczak and Christopher Pike and Christopher Wilson",
note = "{\circledC} Crown Copyright.",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
language = "English",
series = "DTI economics paper",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Davies, S, Coles, H, Olczak, M, Pike, C & Wilson, C 2004 'Benefits from competition: some illustrative UK cases' DTI economics paper, vol. 9.

Benefits from competition : some illustrative UK cases. / Davies, Stephen ; Coles, Heather ; Olczak, Matthew; Pike, Christopher; Wilson, Christopher.

2004. (DTI economics paper; Vol. 9).

Research output: Working paperTechnical report

TY - UNPB

T1 - Benefits from competition

T2 - some illustrative UK cases

AU - Davies, Stephen

AU - Coles, Heather

AU - Olczak, Matthew

AU - Pike, Christopher

AU - Wilson, Christopher

N1 - © Crown Copyright.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - This study provides a powerful demonstration of the real world impact of increasedcompetition. By presenting six market case studies drawn from a variety of sectors itgives evidence of the type and magnitude of the benefits following marketinterventions to develop competition and free up the operation of these sectors.In discussing the types and form such interventions take, whether competition policy,deregulation or liberalisation, this report explores market conditions before and afterintervention, paying careful attention to both the envisaged benefits and the potentialfor negative side effects. Overall, the evidence suggests these benefits materialised,and in a number of instances proved more sizeable than anticipated. Concerns aboutharmful side effects have proved unfounded, with market stimuli impacting not only onthe price and range of goods available but also acting as a motivating force to productand process innovation.As Professor Davies points out, although active competition policy proves an importantcomponent in the competitive process, it is not sufficient in its own right. In order todeliver greater productivity, of which competition is a key driver, the UK needs a pool of resourceful entrepreneurs able to exploit changing market conditions. In order togive these people the best chance of success the framework conditions need to becorrect with strength in the complementary capabilities of innovation, investment, skillsand enterprise.Ensuring the competition framework is world class is central to the DTI’s strategy. The most recent peer review of the UK competition regime demonstrates that the UK isa strong performer, ranked third in the 2004 study, with the US first and Germanysecond. This study provides further evidence of the important role played by thatframework in delivering tangible benefits to consumers.

AB - This study provides a powerful demonstration of the real world impact of increasedcompetition. By presenting six market case studies drawn from a variety of sectors itgives evidence of the type and magnitude of the benefits following marketinterventions to develop competition and free up the operation of these sectors.In discussing the types and form such interventions take, whether competition policy,deregulation or liberalisation, this report explores market conditions before and afterintervention, paying careful attention to both the envisaged benefits and the potentialfor negative side effects. Overall, the evidence suggests these benefits materialised,and in a number of instances proved more sizeable than anticipated. Concerns aboutharmful side effects have proved unfounded, with market stimuli impacting not only onthe price and range of goods available but also acting as a motivating force to productand process innovation.As Professor Davies points out, although active competition policy proves an importantcomponent in the competitive process, it is not sufficient in its own right. In order todeliver greater productivity, of which competition is a key driver, the UK needs a pool of resourceful entrepreneurs able to exploit changing market conditions. In order togive these people the best chance of success the framework conditions need to becorrect with strength in the complementary capabilities of innovation, investment, skillsand enterprise.Ensuring the competition framework is world class is central to the DTI’s strategy. The most recent peer review of the UK competition regime demonstrates that the UK isa strong performer, ranked third in the 2004 study, with the US first and Germanysecond. This study provides further evidence of the important role played by thatframework in delivering tangible benefits to consumers.

UR - http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file13299.pdf

M3 - Technical report

T3 - DTI economics paper

BT - Benefits from competition

ER -

Davies S, Coles H, Olczak M, Pike C, Wilson C. Benefits from competition: some illustrative UK cases. 2004 Jul. (DTI economics paper).