TY - CHAP
T1 - Between incrementalism and revolution: How the GDPR right to data portability is revamped by the EU and the UK post Brexit
AU - Li (he/him), Wenlong
PY - 2022/4/22
Y1 - 2022/4/22
N2 - The right to data portability is facing a new lease of life not long after the GDPR takes effect. post Brexit, the EU and the UK have respectively released blueprints for making this right truly work for data subjects. This means that the undue constraints imposed on this right as a result of political compromise will be lifted, albeit not by revising GDPR provisions. This chapter seeks to map, evaluate and compare the revamping endeavours at both EU and UK levels. By navigating through a plethora of legislative proposals, policies and reviews, it shows that the two jurisdictions are embracing contrasting approaches and thus facing rather distinct challenges. The instruments used, purposes pursued, and how exactly the right is revamped differ greatly, thus calling for a comparative observation. It is argued that the EU could only vitalise the right after turning away from its conceptual maze and attending to the real needs of consumers. The UK should be commended for its stress on consumer needs and agency building but, as a double-edged sword, this approach also prompts a slippery slope towards lowered protection, which should be treated with caution.
AB - The right to data portability is facing a new lease of life not long after the GDPR takes effect. post Brexit, the EU and the UK have respectively released blueprints for making this right truly work for data subjects. This means that the undue constraints imposed on this right as a result of political compromise will be lifted, albeit not by revising GDPR provisions. This chapter seeks to map, evaluate and compare the revamping endeavours at both EU and UK levels. By navigating through a plethora of legislative proposals, policies and reviews, it shows that the two jurisdictions are embracing contrasting approaches and thus facing rather distinct challenges. The instruments used, purposes pursued, and how exactly the right is revamped differ greatly, thus calling for a comparative observation. It is argued that the EU could only vitalise the right after turning away from its conceptual maze and attending to the real needs of consumers. The UK should be commended for its stress on consumer needs and agency building but, as a double-edged sword, this approach also prompts a slippery slope towards lowered protection, which should be treated with caution.
KW - right to data portability
KW - GDPR
KW - Brexit
KW - Data Protection Act
UR - https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781800371675/9781800371675.00031.xml
U2 - 10.4337/9781800371682.00031
DO - 10.4337/9781800371682.00031
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 9781800371675
T3 - Law 2022
SP - 572
EP - 599
BT - Research Handbook on EU Data Protection Law
A2 - Kosta, Eleni
A2 - Leenes, Ronald
A2 - Kamara, Irene
PB - Edward Elgar
ER -