BOD1L Is Required to Suppress Deleterious Resection of Stressed Replication Forks

Martin R Higgs, John J Reynolds, Alicja Winczura, Andrew N Blackford, Valérie Borel, Edward S Miller, Anastasia Zlatanou, Jadwiga Nieminuszczy, Ellis L Ryan, Nicholas J Davies, Tatjana Stankovic, Simon J Boulton, Wojciech Niedzwiedz, Grant S Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recognition and repair of damaged replication forks are essential to maintain genome stability and are coordinated by the combined action of the Fanconi anemia and homologous recombination pathways. These pathways are vital to protect stalled replication forks from uncontrolled nucleolytic activity, which otherwise causes irreparable genomic damage. Here, we identify BOD1L as a component of this fork protection pathway, which safeguards genome stability after replication stress. Loss of BOD1L confers exquisite cellular sensitivity to replication stress and uncontrolled resection of damaged replication forks, due to a failure to stabilize RAD51 at these forks. Blocking DNA2-dependent resection, or downregulation of the helicases BLM and FBH1, suppresses both catastrophic fork processing and the accumulation of chromosomal damage in BOD1L-deficient cells. Thus, our work implicates BOD1L as a critical regulator of genome integrity that restrains nucleolytic degradation of damaged replication forks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)462-77
Number of pages16
JournalMolecular Cell
Volume59
Issue number3
Early online date9 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Aug 2015

Keywords

  • Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics
  • Cell Line
  • Cell Survival
  • DNA Damage
  • DNA Helicases/metabolism
  • DNA Replication
  • DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism
  • Genome, Human
  • Genomic Instability
  • HeLa Cells
  • Humans
  • Rad51 Recombinase/genetics
  • RecQ Helicases/metabolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'BOD1L Is Required to Suppress Deleterious Resection of Stressed Replication Forks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this