Brain and mind in the 'long' eighteenth century

Christopher U.M. Smith*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

How should the 'long' eighteenth century be defined? January 1, 1700 and December 31, 1799 are quite arbitrary dates. Why should they be chosen to segment our history rather than more significant periods of time, periods which have a coherent content, or are marked, perhaps, by the working out of a theme? Students of English literature sometimes take the long eighteenth century to extend from John Milton (Paradise Lost, 1667) to the passing of the first generation of Romantics (Keats (d. 1821), Shelley (d. 1822), Byron (d. 1824), Coleridge (d. 1834)). Students of British political history often take it to start with the accession of Charles II (the Restoration) in 1660 or, alternatively, the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688 and to end with the great Reform Act of 1832. Others might choose different book ends. In the history of science and philosophy the terminus a quo is sometimes taken as the publication of Descartes' scientific philosophy or, in more Anglophone zones, the 1687 publication of Newton's Principia with its vision of a 'clockwork universe'. 'Nature and Nature's laws' as Alexander Pope enthused, 'lay hid in Night: God said, Let Newton be! and all was light!'.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBrain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth Century Neuroscience
EditorsHarry A. Whitaker, Christopher U.M. Smith, Stanley Finger
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherSpringer
Pages15-28
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9780387709673, 9780387709666
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2007

Fingerprint

History
Publications
Brain
Students
Literature
Light

Cite this

Smith, C. U. M. (2007). Brain and mind in the 'long' eighteenth century. In H. A. Whitaker, C. U. M. Smith, & S. Finger (Eds.), Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth Century Neuroscience (pp. 15-28). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_2
Smith, Christopher U.M. / Brain and mind in the 'long' eighteenth century. Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth Century Neuroscience. editor / Harry A. Whitaker ; Christopher U.M. Smith ; Stanley Finger. New York : Springer, 2007. pp. 15-28
@inbook{23aba6d4b9454e8fb3d3ac87742cb856,
title = "Brain and mind in the 'long' eighteenth century",
abstract = "How should the 'long' eighteenth century be defined? January 1, 1700 and December 31, 1799 are quite arbitrary dates. Why should they be chosen to segment our history rather than more significant periods of time, periods which have a coherent content, or are marked, perhaps, by the working out of a theme? Students of English literature sometimes take the long eighteenth century to extend from John Milton (Paradise Lost, 1667) to the passing of the first generation of Romantics (Keats (d. 1821), Shelley (d. 1822), Byron (d. 1824), Coleridge (d. 1834)). Students of British political history often take it to start with the accession of Charles II (the Restoration) in 1660 or, alternatively, the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688 and to end with the great Reform Act of 1832. Others might choose different book ends. In the history of science and philosophy the terminus a quo is sometimes taken as the publication of Descartes' scientific philosophy or, in more Anglophone zones, the 1687 publication of Newton's Principia with its vision of a 'clockwork universe'. 'Nature and Nature's laws' as Alexander Pope enthused, 'lay hid in Night: God said, Let Newton be! and all was light!'.",
author = "Smith, {Christopher U.M.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780387709673",
pages = "15--28",
editor = "Whitaker, {Harry A.} and Smith, {Christopher U.M.} and Stanley Finger",
booktitle = "Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth Century Neuroscience",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "Germany",

}

Smith, CUM 2007, Brain and mind in the 'long' eighteenth century. in HA Whitaker, CUM Smith & S Finger (eds), Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth Century Neuroscience. Springer, New York, pp. 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_2

Brain and mind in the 'long' eighteenth century. / Smith, Christopher U.M.

Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth Century Neuroscience. ed. / Harry A. Whitaker; Christopher U.M. Smith; Stanley Finger. New York : Springer, 2007. p. 15-28.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Brain and mind in the 'long' eighteenth century

AU - Smith, Christopher U.M.

PY - 2007/10/11

Y1 - 2007/10/11

N2 - How should the 'long' eighteenth century be defined? January 1, 1700 and December 31, 1799 are quite arbitrary dates. Why should they be chosen to segment our history rather than more significant periods of time, periods which have a coherent content, or are marked, perhaps, by the working out of a theme? Students of English literature sometimes take the long eighteenth century to extend from John Milton (Paradise Lost, 1667) to the passing of the first generation of Romantics (Keats (d. 1821), Shelley (d. 1822), Byron (d. 1824), Coleridge (d. 1834)). Students of British political history often take it to start with the accession of Charles II (the Restoration) in 1660 or, alternatively, the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688 and to end with the great Reform Act of 1832. Others might choose different book ends. In the history of science and philosophy the terminus a quo is sometimes taken as the publication of Descartes' scientific philosophy or, in more Anglophone zones, the 1687 publication of Newton's Principia with its vision of a 'clockwork universe'. 'Nature and Nature's laws' as Alexander Pope enthused, 'lay hid in Night: God said, Let Newton be! and all was light!'.

AB - How should the 'long' eighteenth century be defined? January 1, 1700 and December 31, 1799 are quite arbitrary dates. Why should they be chosen to segment our history rather than more significant periods of time, periods which have a coherent content, or are marked, perhaps, by the working out of a theme? Students of English literature sometimes take the long eighteenth century to extend from John Milton (Paradise Lost, 1667) to the passing of the first generation of Romantics (Keats (d. 1821), Shelley (d. 1822), Byron (d. 1824), Coleridge (d. 1834)). Students of British political history often take it to start with the accession of Charles II (the Restoration) in 1660 or, alternatively, the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688 and to end with the great Reform Act of 1832. Others might choose different book ends. In the history of science and philosophy the terminus a quo is sometimes taken as the publication of Descartes' scientific philosophy or, in more Anglophone zones, the 1687 publication of Newton's Principia with its vision of a 'clockwork universe'. 'Nature and Nature's laws' as Alexander Pope enthused, 'lay hid in Night: God said, Let Newton be! and all was light!'.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919838642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://springerlink.metapress.com/content/k5141u11j065l6h3/

U2 - 10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_2

DO - 10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_2

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780387709673

SN - 9780387709666

SP - 15

EP - 28

BT - Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth Century Neuroscience

A2 - Whitaker, Harry A.

A2 - Smith, Christopher U.M.

A2 - Finger, Stanley

PB - Springer

CY - New York

ER -

Smith CUM. Brain and mind in the 'long' eighteenth century. In Whitaker HA, Smith CUM, Finger S, editors, Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays in Eighteenth Century Neuroscience. New York: Springer. 2007. p. 15-28 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70967-3_2