Brexit and UK international development policy

Simon Lightfoot, Emma Mawdsley, Balázs Szent-Iványi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article we explore the implications of Brexit for the UK and the EU's development policies and strategic directions, focusing on the former. While it is likely that the operational process of disentangling the UK from the various development institutions of the EU will be relatively straightforward, the choices that lie ahead about whether and how to cooperate thereafter are more complex. Aid and development policy touches on a wide range of interests—security, trade, climate change, migration, gender rights, and so on. We argue that Brexit will accelerate existing trends within UK development policy, notably towards the growing priority of private sector-led economic growth strategies and blended finance tools. There are strong signals that UK aid will be cut, as successive secretaries of state appear unable to persuade a substantial section of the public and media that UK aid and development policy serves UK interests in a variety of ways.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517–524
Number of pages8
JournalPolitical Quarterly
Volume88
Issue number3
Early online date9 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

Fingerprint

development policy
EU
private sector
finance
economic growth
climate change
migration
gender
trend

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Lightfoot, S., Mawdsley, E. and Szent-Iványi, B. (2017), Brexit and UK International Development Policy. The Political Quarterly, in press which has been published in final form at doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12369. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Keywords

  • international development
  • EU
  • UK
  • foreign aid

Cite this

Lightfoot, Simon ; Mawdsley, Emma ; Szent-Iványi, Balázs. / Brexit and UK international development policy. In: Political Quarterly. 2017 ; Vol. 88, No. 3. pp. 517–524.
@article{f495a702672d4070869c8859f1f6bf49,
title = "Brexit and UK international development policy",
abstract = "In this article we explore the implications of Brexit for the UK and the EU's development policies and strategic directions, focusing on the former. While it is likely that the operational process of disentangling the UK from the various development institutions of the EU will be relatively straightforward, the choices that lie ahead about whether and how to cooperate thereafter are more complex. Aid and development policy touches on a wide range of interests—security, trade, climate change, migration, gender rights, and so on. We argue that Brexit will accelerate existing trends within UK development policy, notably towards the growing priority of private sector-led economic growth strategies and blended finance tools. There are strong signals that UK aid will be cut, as successive secretaries of state appear unable to persuade a substantial section of the public and media that UK aid and development policy serves UK interests in a variety of ways.",
keywords = "international development, EU, UK, foreign aid",
author = "Simon Lightfoot and Emma Mawdsley and Bal{\'a}zs Szent-Iv{\'a}nyi",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Lightfoot, S., Mawdsley, E. and Szent-Iv{\'a}nyi, B. (2017), Brexit and UK International Development Policy. The Political Quarterly, in press which has been published in final form at doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12369. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/1467-923X.12369",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "517–524",
journal = "Political Quarterly",
issn = "0032-3179",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Brexit and UK international development policy. / Lightfoot, Simon; Mawdsley, Emma; Szent-Iványi, Balázs.

In: Political Quarterly, Vol. 88, No. 3, 07.2017, p. 517–524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brexit and UK international development policy

AU - Lightfoot, Simon

AU - Mawdsley, Emma

AU - Szent-Iványi, Balázs

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Lightfoot, S., Mawdsley, E. and Szent-Iványi, B. (2017), Brexit and UK International Development Policy. The Political Quarterly, in press which has been published in final form at doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12369. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - In this article we explore the implications of Brexit for the UK and the EU's development policies and strategic directions, focusing on the former. While it is likely that the operational process of disentangling the UK from the various development institutions of the EU will be relatively straightforward, the choices that lie ahead about whether and how to cooperate thereafter are more complex. Aid and development policy touches on a wide range of interests—security, trade, climate change, migration, gender rights, and so on. We argue that Brexit will accelerate existing trends within UK development policy, notably towards the growing priority of private sector-led economic growth strategies and blended finance tools. There are strong signals that UK aid will be cut, as successive secretaries of state appear unable to persuade a substantial section of the public and media that UK aid and development policy serves UK interests in a variety of ways.

AB - In this article we explore the implications of Brexit for the UK and the EU's development policies and strategic directions, focusing on the former. While it is likely that the operational process of disentangling the UK from the various development institutions of the EU will be relatively straightforward, the choices that lie ahead about whether and how to cooperate thereafter are more complex. Aid and development policy touches on a wide range of interests—security, trade, climate change, migration, gender rights, and so on. We argue that Brexit will accelerate existing trends within UK development policy, notably towards the growing priority of private sector-led economic growth strategies and blended finance tools. There are strong signals that UK aid will be cut, as successive secretaries of state appear unable to persuade a substantial section of the public and media that UK aid and development policy serves UK interests in a variety of ways.

KW - international development

KW - EU

KW - UK

KW - foreign aid

U2 - 10.1111/1467-923X.12369

DO - 10.1111/1467-923X.12369

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 517

EP - 524

JO - Political Quarterly

JF - Political Quarterly

SN - 0032-3179

IS - 3

ER -