Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse

Ben Anderson, Helen F. Wilson, Peter J. Forman, Julia Heslop, Emma Ormerod, Gaja Maestri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Alongside the emergence of various populisms, Brexit and other contemporary geopolitical events have been presented as symptomatic of a generalising and intensifying sense of uncertainty in the midst of a crisis of (neo)liberalism. In this paper we describe what kind of event Brexit became in the impasse between the UK’s EU referendum in 2016 and its anticipated exit from the EU in 2019. Based on 108 interviews with people in the North‐East of England, we trace how Brexit was variously enacted and felt as an end, advent, a harbinger of worse to come, non‐event, disaster, and betrayed promise. By following how these incommensurate versions of Brexit took form and co‐exist, we supplement explanatory and predictive approaches to the geographies of Brexit and exemplify an approach that traces what such geopolitical events become. Specifically, we use the concept of “modes of uncertainty” as a way of discerning patterns in how present uncertainties are lived. A “mode of uncertainty” is a shared set of practices animated by a distinctive mood through which futures are made present and felt. Rather than treat uncertainty as a static, explanatory context, we thus follow how different versions of Brexit are constituted through specific “modes of (un)certainty” – negative hope, national optimisms, apprehensive hopefulness and fantasies of action – that differentiate within a seemingly singular, shared sense of uncertainty.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Early online date31 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 31 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

uncertainty
event
EU
referendum
neoliberalism
mood
supplement
disaster
geography
present
interview

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • anticipation
  • hope
  • modes of uncertainty
  • structures of feeling
  • uncertainty

Cite this

Anderson, B., Wilson, H. F., Forman, P. J., Heslop, J., Ormerod, E., & Maestri, G. (2019). Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12348
Anderson, Ben ; Wilson, Helen F. ; Forman, Peter J. ; Heslop, Julia ; Ormerod, Emma ; Maestri, Gaja. / Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse. In: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2019.
@article{370907a7227b48f681a59bd866412cc9,
title = "Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse",
abstract = "Alongside the emergence of various populisms, Brexit and other contemporary geopolitical events have been presented as symptomatic of a generalising and intensifying sense of uncertainty in the midst of a crisis of (neo)liberalism. In this paper we describe what kind of event Brexit became in the impasse between the UK’s EU referendum in 2016 and its anticipated exit from the EU in 2019. Based on 108 interviews with people in the North‐East of England, we trace how Brexit was variously enacted and felt as an end, advent, a harbinger of worse to come, non‐event, disaster, and betrayed promise. By following how these incommensurate versions of Brexit took form and co‐exist, we supplement explanatory and predictive approaches to the geographies of Brexit and exemplify an approach that traces what such geopolitical events become. Specifically, we use the concept of “modes of uncertainty” as a way of discerning patterns in how present uncertainties are lived. A “mode of uncertainty” is a shared set of practices animated by a distinctive mood through which futures are made present and felt. Rather than treat uncertainty as a static, explanatory context, we thus follow how different versions of Brexit are constituted through specific “modes of (un)certainty” – negative hope, national optimisms, apprehensive hopefulness and fantasies of action – that differentiate within a seemingly singular, shared sense of uncertainty.",
keywords = "Brexit, anticipation, hope, modes of uncertainty, structures of feeling, uncertainty",
author = "Ben Anderson and Wilson, {Helen F.} and Forman, {Peter J.} and Julia Heslop and Emma Ormerod and Gaja Maestri",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/tran.12348",
language = "English",

}

Anderson, B, Wilson, HF, Forman, PJ, Heslop, J, Ormerod, E & Maestri, G 2019, 'Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12348

Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse. / Anderson, Ben; Wilson, Helen F.; Forman, Peter J.; Heslop, Julia; Ormerod, Emma; Maestri, Gaja.

In: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse

AU - Anderson, Ben

AU - Wilson, Helen F.

AU - Forman, Peter J.

AU - Heslop, Julia

AU - Ormerod, Emma

AU - Maestri, Gaja

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - Alongside the emergence of various populisms, Brexit and other contemporary geopolitical events have been presented as symptomatic of a generalising and intensifying sense of uncertainty in the midst of a crisis of (neo)liberalism. In this paper we describe what kind of event Brexit became in the impasse between the UK’s EU referendum in 2016 and its anticipated exit from the EU in 2019. Based on 108 interviews with people in the North‐East of England, we trace how Brexit was variously enacted and felt as an end, advent, a harbinger of worse to come, non‐event, disaster, and betrayed promise. By following how these incommensurate versions of Brexit took form and co‐exist, we supplement explanatory and predictive approaches to the geographies of Brexit and exemplify an approach that traces what such geopolitical events become. Specifically, we use the concept of “modes of uncertainty” as a way of discerning patterns in how present uncertainties are lived. A “mode of uncertainty” is a shared set of practices animated by a distinctive mood through which futures are made present and felt. Rather than treat uncertainty as a static, explanatory context, we thus follow how different versions of Brexit are constituted through specific “modes of (un)certainty” – negative hope, national optimisms, apprehensive hopefulness and fantasies of action – that differentiate within a seemingly singular, shared sense of uncertainty.

AB - Alongside the emergence of various populisms, Brexit and other contemporary geopolitical events have been presented as symptomatic of a generalising and intensifying sense of uncertainty in the midst of a crisis of (neo)liberalism. In this paper we describe what kind of event Brexit became in the impasse between the UK’s EU referendum in 2016 and its anticipated exit from the EU in 2019. Based on 108 interviews with people in the North‐East of England, we trace how Brexit was variously enacted and felt as an end, advent, a harbinger of worse to come, non‐event, disaster, and betrayed promise. By following how these incommensurate versions of Brexit took form and co‐exist, we supplement explanatory and predictive approaches to the geographies of Brexit and exemplify an approach that traces what such geopolitical events become. Specifically, we use the concept of “modes of uncertainty” as a way of discerning patterns in how present uncertainties are lived. A “mode of uncertainty” is a shared set of practices animated by a distinctive mood through which futures are made present and felt. Rather than treat uncertainty as a static, explanatory context, we thus follow how different versions of Brexit are constituted through specific “modes of (un)certainty” – negative hope, national optimisms, apprehensive hopefulness and fantasies of action – that differentiate within a seemingly singular, shared sense of uncertainty.

KW - Brexit

KW - anticipation

KW - hope

KW - modes of uncertainty

KW - structures of feeling

KW - uncertainty

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/tran.12348

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074861332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/tran.12348

DO - 10.1111/tran.12348

M3 - Article

ER -

Anderson B, Wilson HF, Forman PJ, Heslop J, Ormerod E, Maestri G. Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2019 Oct 31. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12348