Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research

Rachel Shaw

doi:10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165

Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research

Rachel Shaw^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter, comment/opinion or interview › peer-review

2 Citations (SciVal)

144 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2
Since writing our …

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	80
Number of pages	1
Journal	Evidence-based Medicine
Volume	20
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165
Publication status	Published - Apr 2015

Bibliographical note

This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80 is available online at: Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80

Access to Document

10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165

Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research
This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80 is available online at: Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80
Accepted author manuscript, 40.3 KB

http://ebm.bmj.com/content/20/2/80

Cite this

@article{95300dfaedde4d358d8bce48c2c92bf4,

title = "Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research",

abstract = "On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2 Since writing our …",

author = "Rachel Shaw",

note = "This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80 is available online at: Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80",

year = "2015",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "80",

journal = "Evidence-based Medicine",

issn = "1356-5524",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research

AU - Shaw, Rachel

N1 - This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80 is available online at: Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2 Since writing our …

AB - On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2 Since writing our …

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84928155240

U2 - 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165

DO - 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165

M3 - Letter, comment/opinion or interview

C2 - 25699565

SN - 1356-5524

VL - 20

SP - 80

JO - Evidence-based Medicine

JF - Evidence-based Medicine

IS - 2

ER -

Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this