Cascaded Bayesian processes: an account of bias in orientation perception

Keith Langley, Veronique Lefebvre, Stephen J. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Following adaptation to an oriented (1-d) signal in central vision, the orientation of subsequently viewed test signals may appear repelled away from or attracted towards the adapting orientation. Small angular differences between the adaptor and test yield 'repulsive' shifts, while large angular differences yield 'attractive' shifts. In peripheral vision, however, both small and large angular differences yield repulsive shifts. To account for these tilt after-effects (TAEs), a cascaded model of orientation estimation that is optimized using hierarchical Bayesian methods is proposed. The model accounts for orientation bias through adaptation-induced losses in information that arise because of signal uncertainties and neural constraints placed upon the propagation of visual information. Repulsive (direct) TAEs arise at early stages of visual processing from adaptation of orientation-selective units with peak sensitivity at the orientation of the adaptor (theta). Attractive (indirect) TAEs result from adaptation of second-stage units with peak sensitivity at theta and theta+90 degrees , which arise from an efficient stage of linear compression that pools across the responses of the first-stage orientation-selective units. A spatial orientation vector is estimated from the transformed oriented unit responses. The change from attractive to repulsive TAEs in peripheral vision can be explained by the differing harmonic biases resulting from constraints on signal power (in central vision) versus signal uncertainties in orientation (in peripheral vision). The proposed model is consistent with recent work by computational neuroscientists in supposing that visual bias reflects the adjustment of a rational system in the light of uncertain signals and system constraints.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2453-2474
Number of pages22
JournalVision Research
Volume49
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Social Adjustment
Bayes Theorem
Spatial Orientation
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • tilt after-effect
  • cascaded bayes
  • adaptation
  • orientation
  • vision
  • direct effect
  • indirect effect

Cite this

Langley, Keith ; Lefebvre, Veronique ; Anderson, Stephen J. / Cascaded Bayesian processes: an account of bias in orientation perception. In: Vision Research. 2009 ; Vol. 49, No. 20. pp. 2453-2474.
@article{2e58f587bd564b0e887de2cbe0393a13,
title = "Cascaded Bayesian processes: an account of bias in orientation perception",
abstract = "Following adaptation to an oriented (1-d) signal in central vision, the orientation of subsequently viewed test signals may appear repelled away from or attracted towards the adapting orientation. Small angular differences between the adaptor and test yield 'repulsive' shifts, while large angular differences yield 'attractive' shifts. In peripheral vision, however, both small and large angular differences yield repulsive shifts. To account for these tilt after-effects (TAEs), a cascaded model of orientation estimation that is optimized using hierarchical Bayesian methods is proposed. The model accounts for orientation bias through adaptation-induced losses in information that arise because of signal uncertainties and neural constraints placed upon the propagation of visual information. Repulsive (direct) TAEs arise at early stages of visual processing from adaptation of orientation-selective units with peak sensitivity at the orientation of the adaptor (theta). Attractive (indirect) TAEs result from adaptation of second-stage units with peak sensitivity at theta and theta+90 degrees , which arise from an efficient stage of linear compression that pools across the responses of the first-stage orientation-selective units. A spatial orientation vector is estimated from the transformed oriented unit responses. The change from attractive to repulsive TAEs in peripheral vision can be explained by the differing harmonic biases resulting from constraints on signal power (in central vision) versus signal uncertainties in orientation (in peripheral vision). The proposed model is consistent with recent work by computational neuroscientists in supposing that visual bias reflects the adjustment of a rational system in the light of uncertain signals and system constraints.",
keywords = "tilt after-effect, cascaded bayes, adaptation, orientation, vision, direct effect, indirect effect",
author = "Keith Langley and Veronique Lefebvre and Anderson, {Stephen J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.015",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "2453--2474",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "20",

}

Cascaded Bayesian processes: an account of bias in orientation perception. / Langley, Keith; Lefebvre, Veronique; Anderson, Stephen J.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 49, No. 20, 15.10.2009, p. 2453-2474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cascaded Bayesian processes: an account of bias in orientation perception

AU - Langley, Keith

AU - Lefebvre, Veronique

AU - Anderson, Stephen J.

PY - 2009/10/15

Y1 - 2009/10/15

N2 - Following adaptation to an oriented (1-d) signal in central vision, the orientation of subsequently viewed test signals may appear repelled away from or attracted towards the adapting orientation. Small angular differences between the adaptor and test yield 'repulsive' shifts, while large angular differences yield 'attractive' shifts. In peripheral vision, however, both small and large angular differences yield repulsive shifts. To account for these tilt after-effects (TAEs), a cascaded model of orientation estimation that is optimized using hierarchical Bayesian methods is proposed. The model accounts for orientation bias through adaptation-induced losses in information that arise because of signal uncertainties and neural constraints placed upon the propagation of visual information. Repulsive (direct) TAEs arise at early stages of visual processing from adaptation of orientation-selective units with peak sensitivity at the orientation of the adaptor (theta). Attractive (indirect) TAEs result from adaptation of second-stage units with peak sensitivity at theta and theta+90 degrees , which arise from an efficient stage of linear compression that pools across the responses of the first-stage orientation-selective units. A spatial orientation vector is estimated from the transformed oriented unit responses. The change from attractive to repulsive TAEs in peripheral vision can be explained by the differing harmonic biases resulting from constraints on signal power (in central vision) versus signal uncertainties in orientation (in peripheral vision). The proposed model is consistent with recent work by computational neuroscientists in supposing that visual bias reflects the adjustment of a rational system in the light of uncertain signals and system constraints.

AB - Following adaptation to an oriented (1-d) signal in central vision, the orientation of subsequently viewed test signals may appear repelled away from or attracted towards the adapting orientation. Small angular differences between the adaptor and test yield 'repulsive' shifts, while large angular differences yield 'attractive' shifts. In peripheral vision, however, both small and large angular differences yield repulsive shifts. To account for these tilt after-effects (TAEs), a cascaded model of orientation estimation that is optimized using hierarchical Bayesian methods is proposed. The model accounts for orientation bias through adaptation-induced losses in information that arise because of signal uncertainties and neural constraints placed upon the propagation of visual information. Repulsive (direct) TAEs arise at early stages of visual processing from adaptation of orientation-selective units with peak sensitivity at the orientation of the adaptor (theta). Attractive (indirect) TAEs result from adaptation of second-stage units with peak sensitivity at theta and theta+90 degrees , which arise from an efficient stage of linear compression that pools across the responses of the first-stage orientation-selective units. A spatial orientation vector is estimated from the transformed oriented unit responses. The change from attractive to repulsive TAEs in peripheral vision can be explained by the differing harmonic biases resulting from constraints on signal power (in central vision) versus signal uncertainties in orientation (in peripheral vision). The proposed model is consistent with recent work by computational neuroscientists in supposing that visual bias reflects the adjustment of a rational system in the light of uncertain signals and system constraints.

KW - tilt after-effect

KW - cascaded bayes

KW - adaptation

KW - orientation

KW - vision

KW - direct effect

KW - indirect effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349472925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.015

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 2453

EP - 2474

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 20

ER -