Changing beliefs about past public events with believable and unbelievable doctored photographs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Doctored photographs can shape what people believe and remember about prominent public events, perhaps due to their apparent credibility. In three studies, subjects completed surveys about the 2012 London Olympic torch relay (Experiment 1) or the 2011 Royal Wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton (Experiments 2-3). Some were shown a genuine photo of the event; others saw a doctored photo that depicted protesters and unrest. A third group of subjects saw a doctored photo whose inauthenticity had been made explicit, either by adding a written disclaimer (Experiment 1) or by making the digital manipulation deliberately poor (Experiments 2-3). In all three studies, doctored photos had small effects on a subset of subjects’ beliefs about the events. Of central interest though, comparable effects also emerged when the photos were overtly inauthentic. These findings suggest that cognitive mechanisms other than credibility—such as familiarity misattribution and mental imagery—can rapidly influence beliefs about past events even when the low credibility of a source is overt.
LanguageEnglish
Pages439-450
Number of pages12
JournalMemory
Volume26
Early online date17 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Experiment
Credibility
Surveys and Questionnaires
Recognition (Psychology)
Kate Middleton
Disclaimers
Protesters
Olympic Torch
London Olympics
Manipulation
Familiarity
Mental Imagery
Unrest
Royal Wedding

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Memory on 17/08/17, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2017.1364393

Keywords

  • belief distortion
  • photographs
  • credibility
  • familiarity
  • images

Cite this

@article{71b7740db117451a91963bebd215f17f,
title = "Changing beliefs about past public events with believable and unbelievable doctored photographs",
abstract = "Doctored photographs can shape what people believe and remember about prominent public events, perhaps due to their apparent credibility. In three studies, subjects completed surveys about the 2012 London Olympic torch relay (Experiment 1) or the 2011 Royal Wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton (Experiments 2-3). Some were shown a genuine photo of the event; others saw a doctored photo that depicted protesters and unrest. A third group of subjects saw a doctored photo whose inauthenticity had been made explicit, either by adding a written disclaimer (Experiment 1) or by making the digital manipulation deliberately poor (Experiments 2-3). In all three studies, doctored photos had small effects on a subset of subjects’ beliefs about the events. Of central interest though, comparable effects also emerged when the photos were overtly inauthentic. These findings suggest that cognitive mechanisms other than credibility—such as familiarity misattribution and mental imagery—can rapidly influence beliefs about past events even when the low credibility of a source is overt.",
keywords = "belief distortion, photographs, credibility, familiarity, images",
author = "Nash, {Robert A.}",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Memory on 17/08/17, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2017.1364393",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2017.1364393",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "439--450",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press",

}

Changing beliefs about past public events with believable and unbelievable doctored photographs. / Nash, Robert A.

In: Memory, Vol. 26, 01.04.2018, p. 439-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing beliefs about past public events with believable and unbelievable doctored photographs

AU - Nash, Robert A.

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Memory on 17/08/17, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2017.1364393

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Doctored photographs can shape what people believe and remember about prominent public events, perhaps due to their apparent credibility. In three studies, subjects completed surveys about the 2012 London Olympic torch relay (Experiment 1) or the 2011 Royal Wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton (Experiments 2-3). Some were shown a genuine photo of the event; others saw a doctored photo that depicted protesters and unrest. A third group of subjects saw a doctored photo whose inauthenticity had been made explicit, either by adding a written disclaimer (Experiment 1) or by making the digital manipulation deliberately poor (Experiments 2-3). In all three studies, doctored photos had small effects on a subset of subjects’ beliefs about the events. Of central interest though, comparable effects also emerged when the photos were overtly inauthentic. These findings suggest that cognitive mechanisms other than credibility—such as familiarity misattribution and mental imagery—can rapidly influence beliefs about past events even when the low credibility of a source is overt.

AB - Doctored photographs can shape what people believe and remember about prominent public events, perhaps due to their apparent credibility. In three studies, subjects completed surveys about the 2012 London Olympic torch relay (Experiment 1) or the 2011 Royal Wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton (Experiments 2-3). Some were shown a genuine photo of the event; others saw a doctored photo that depicted protesters and unrest. A third group of subjects saw a doctored photo whose inauthenticity had been made explicit, either by adding a written disclaimer (Experiment 1) or by making the digital manipulation deliberately poor (Experiments 2-3). In all three studies, doctored photos had small effects on a subset of subjects’ beliefs about the events. Of central interest though, comparable effects also emerged when the photos were overtly inauthentic. These findings suggest that cognitive mechanisms other than credibility—such as familiarity misattribution and mental imagery—can rapidly influence beliefs about past events even when the low credibility of a source is overt.

KW - belief distortion

KW - photographs

KW - credibility

KW - familiarity

KW - images

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2017.1364393

UR - http://doi.org/10.17036/researchdata.aston.ac.uk.00000283

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027847989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2017.1364393

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2017.1364393

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 439

EP - 450

JO - Memory

T2 - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

ER -