Charity Performance Reporting, regulatory policy and standard-setting

Danielle McConville, Carolyn J. Cordery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Internationally, there are strong calls for charities’ formal annual reporting to include non-financial performance information. Without the international standards common in other sectors, national accounting standard-setters often regulate charities’ reporting. Lacking evidence on approaches to encouraging/ mandating charity performance reporting, and the effectiveness of these approaches, we ask: “How have different jurisdictions responded to calls for increasing performance reporting?”
We conduct a benchmarking study that indicates differences in current reporting practices between Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. By discussing both current regimes and proposed projects, we develop and illustrate a typology of regulatory approaches to performance reporting. These range from command and control, where standard-setters mandate specific performance reporting standards, through to market regulation, where charities and/or sector bodies acting as regulatory entrepreneurs determine what is to be reported. Between these extremes, the typology describes new governance approaches, with standard-setters partnering and collaborating with other actors. These approaches lead to different requirements with potentially significant implications for performance accountability in the respective jurisdictions. We argue that our regulatory typology contributes useful insights for the many jurisdictions grappling with how to regulate their charity sector and encourage performance reporting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)300-314
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Accounting and Public Policy
Volume37
Issue number4
Early online date18 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

regulatory policy
performance
jurisdiction
typology
Charity
Regulatory policy
benchmarking
entrepreneur
New Zealand
regime
governance
regulation
responsibility
market
Jurisdiction

Bibliographical note

© 2018, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • Performance accountability
  • regulatory policy
  • non-financial reporting
  • Charity regulation
  • ‘Telling your story’

Cite this

@article{2495cb4274c84d0ea1a2248e33d3bb90,
title = "Charity Performance Reporting, regulatory policy and standard-setting",
abstract = "Internationally, there are strong calls for charities’ formal annual reporting to include non-financial performance information. Without the international standards common in other sectors, national accounting standard-setters often regulate charities’ reporting. Lacking evidence on approaches to encouraging/ mandating charity performance reporting, and the effectiveness of these approaches, we ask: “How have different jurisdictions responded to calls for increasing performance reporting?”We conduct a benchmarking study that indicates differences in current reporting practices between Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. By discussing both current regimes and proposed projects, we develop and illustrate a typology of regulatory approaches to performance reporting. These range from command and control, where standard-setters mandate specific performance reporting standards, through to market regulation, where charities and/or sector bodies acting as regulatory entrepreneurs determine what is to be reported. Between these extremes, the typology describes new governance approaches, with standard-setters partnering and collaborating with other actors. These approaches lead to different requirements with potentially significant implications for performance accountability in the respective jurisdictions. We argue that our regulatory typology contributes useful insights for the many jurisdictions grappling with how to regulate their charity sector and encourage performance reporting.",
keywords = "Performance accountability, regulatory policy, non-financial reporting, Charity regulation, ‘Telling your story’",
author = "Danielle McConville and Cordery, {Carolyn J.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2018, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "300--314",
journal = "Journal of Accounting and Public Policy",
issn = "0278-4254",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Charity Performance Reporting, regulatory policy and standard-setting. / McConville, Danielle; Cordery, Carolyn J.

In: Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 37, No. 4, 19.07.2018, p. 300-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Charity Performance Reporting, regulatory policy and standard-setting

AU - McConville, Danielle

AU - Cordery, Carolyn J.

N1 - © 2018, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2018/7/19

Y1 - 2018/7/19

N2 - Internationally, there are strong calls for charities’ formal annual reporting to include non-financial performance information. Without the international standards common in other sectors, national accounting standard-setters often regulate charities’ reporting. Lacking evidence on approaches to encouraging/ mandating charity performance reporting, and the effectiveness of these approaches, we ask: “How have different jurisdictions responded to calls for increasing performance reporting?”We conduct a benchmarking study that indicates differences in current reporting practices between Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. By discussing both current regimes and proposed projects, we develop and illustrate a typology of regulatory approaches to performance reporting. These range from command and control, where standard-setters mandate specific performance reporting standards, through to market regulation, where charities and/or sector bodies acting as regulatory entrepreneurs determine what is to be reported. Between these extremes, the typology describes new governance approaches, with standard-setters partnering and collaborating with other actors. These approaches lead to different requirements with potentially significant implications for performance accountability in the respective jurisdictions. We argue that our regulatory typology contributes useful insights for the many jurisdictions grappling with how to regulate their charity sector and encourage performance reporting.

AB - Internationally, there are strong calls for charities’ formal annual reporting to include non-financial performance information. Without the international standards common in other sectors, national accounting standard-setters often regulate charities’ reporting. Lacking evidence on approaches to encouraging/ mandating charity performance reporting, and the effectiveness of these approaches, we ask: “How have different jurisdictions responded to calls for increasing performance reporting?”We conduct a benchmarking study that indicates differences in current reporting practices between Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. By discussing both current regimes and proposed projects, we develop and illustrate a typology of regulatory approaches to performance reporting. These range from command and control, where standard-setters mandate specific performance reporting standards, through to market regulation, where charities and/or sector bodies acting as regulatory entrepreneurs determine what is to be reported. Between these extremes, the typology describes new governance approaches, with standard-setters partnering and collaborating with other actors. These approaches lead to different requirements with potentially significant implications for performance accountability in the respective jurisdictions. We argue that our regulatory typology contributes useful insights for the many jurisdictions grappling with how to regulate their charity sector and encourage performance reporting.

KW - Performance accountability

KW - regulatory policy

KW - non-financial reporting

KW - Charity regulation

KW - ‘Telling your story’

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425418300917?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 300

EP - 314

JO - Journal of Accounting and Public Policy

JF - Journal of Accounting and Public Policy

SN - 0278-4254

IS - 4

ER -