China’s sovereignty violations in the East and South China Seas: How should Europe respond?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The EU has been content to remain a marginal actor in the maritime sovereignty disputes in the East and South China Seas. It has adopted a diplomatic strategy that stresses the importance of upholding freedom of navigation and confidence building between the states party to the conflict. As argued here, this approach does not take account of the crucial interests Europe has at stake in the conflict. It is made even less tenable by China’s increasingly assertive behaviour towards securing its sovereignty in the region. Europe is at a crossroads: the EU may seek to overcome internal and external challenges to enhance its hard power capabilities, or it may continue to pursue a wholly soft power approach. Either way, how the EU deals with the current dispute will determine, in large part, its future role as a global security actor.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean View
Early online date10 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

sovereignty
EU
China
party state
confidence

Bibliographical note

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Keywords

  • Europe
  • China
  • South China Sea
  • Southeast Asia
  • ASEAN
  • Japan
  • Sovereignty

Cite this

@article{8febdf5fe7be4834bb48317f76bc608e,
title = "China’s sovereignty violations in the East and South China Seas: How should Europe respond?",
abstract = "The EU has been content to remain a marginal actor in the maritime sovereignty disputes in the East and South China Seas. It has adopted a diplomatic strategy that stresses the importance of upholding freedom of navigation and confidence building between the states party to the conflict. As argued here, this approach does not take account of the crucial interests Europe has at stake in the conflict. It is made even less tenable by China’s increasingly assertive behaviour towards securing its sovereignty in the region. Europe is at a crossroads: the EU may seek to overcome internal and external challenges to enhance its hard power capabilities, or it may continue to pursue a wholly soft power approach. Either way, how the EU deals with the current dispute will determine, in large part, its future role as a global security actor.",
keywords = "Europe, China, South China Sea, Southeast Asia, ASEAN, Japan, Sovereignty",
author = "Laura Southgate",
note = "This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1177/1781685819882863",
language = "English",

}

China’s sovereignty violations in the East and South China Seas: How should Europe respond? / Southgate, Laura.

In: European View, 10.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - China’s sovereignty violations in the East and South China Seas: How should Europe respond?

AU - Southgate, Laura

N1 - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

PY - 2019/10/10

Y1 - 2019/10/10

N2 - The EU has been content to remain a marginal actor in the maritime sovereignty disputes in the East and South China Seas. It has adopted a diplomatic strategy that stresses the importance of upholding freedom of navigation and confidence building between the states party to the conflict. As argued here, this approach does not take account of the crucial interests Europe has at stake in the conflict. It is made even less tenable by China’s increasingly assertive behaviour towards securing its sovereignty in the region. Europe is at a crossroads: the EU may seek to overcome internal and external challenges to enhance its hard power capabilities, or it may continue to pursue a wholly soft power approach. Either way, how the EU deals with the current dispute will determine, in large part, its future role as a global security actor.

AB - The EU has been content to remain a marginal actor in the maritime sovereignty disputes in the East and South China Seas. It has adopted a diplomatic strategy that stresses the importance of upholding freedom of navigation and confidence building between the states party to the conflict. As argued here, this approach does not take account of the crucial interests Europe has at stake in the conflict. It is made even less tenable by China’s increasingly assertive behaviour towards securing its sovereignty in the region. Europe is at a crossroads: the EU may seek to overcome internal and external challenges to enhance its hard power capabilities, or it may continue to pursue a wholly soft power approach. Either way, how the EU deals with the current dispute will determine, in large part, its future role as a global security actor.

KW - Europe

KW - China

KW - South China Sea

KW - Southeast Asia

KW - ASEAN

KW - Japan

KW - Sovereignty

UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1781685819882863

U2 - 10.1177/1781685819882863

DO - 10.1177/1781685819882863

M3 - Article

ER -