Climate change and knowledge politics

Reiner Grundmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper addresses the paradox that although the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has reached a broad consensus, various governments pursue different, if not opposing policies. This puzzle not only challenges the traditional belief that scientific knowledge is objective and can be more or less directly translated into political action, but also calls for a better understanding of the relation between science and public policy in modern society. Based on the conceptual framework of knowledge politics the use of expert knowledge in public discourse and in political decisions will be analysed. This will be carried out through a country comparison between the United States and Germany. The main finding is that the press in both countries relies on different sources of scientific expertise when reporting on global warming. In a similar way, governments in both countries use these different sources for legitimising their contrasting policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-432
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

politics
climate change
political decision
expert knowledge
science policy
political action
expertise
public policy
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
conceptual framework
discourse
global warming
knowledge
policy
public
Society
decision
comparison
society
press

Cite this

Grundmann, Reiner. / Climate change and knowledge politics. In: Environmental Politics. 2007 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 414-432.
@article{6cce3de4a98e49faa7a26acfb7835e72,
title = "Climate change and knowledge politics",
abstract = "This paper addresses the paradox that although the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has reached a broad consensus, various governments pursue different, if not opposing policies. This puzzle not only challenges the traditional belief that scientific knowledge is objective and can be more or less directly translated into political action, but also calls for a better understanding of the relation between science and public policy in modern society. Based on the conceptual framework of knowledge politics the use of expert knowledge in public discourse and in political decisions will be analysed. This will be carried out through a country comparison between the United States and Germany. The main finding is that the press in both countries relies on different sources of scientific expertise when reporting on global warming. In a similar way, governments in both countries use these different sources for legitimising their contrasting policies.",
author = "Reiner Grundmann",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/09644010701251656",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "414--432",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Climate change and knowledge politics. / Grundmann, Reiner.

In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 414-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate change and knowledge politics

AU - Grundmann, Reiner

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - This paper addresses the paradox that although the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has reached a broad consensus, various governments pursue different, if not opposing policies. This puzzle not only challenges the traditional belief that scientific knowledge is objective and can be more or less directly translated into political action, but also calls for a better understanding of the relation between science and public policy in modern society. Based on the conceptual framework of knowledge politics the use of expert knowledge in public discourse and in political decisions will be analysed. This will be carried out through a country comparison between the United States and Germany. The main finding is that the press in both countries relies on different sources of scientific expertise when reporting on global warming. In a similar way, governments in both countries use these different sources for legitimising their contrasting policies.

AB - This paper addresses the paradox that although the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has reached a broad consensus, various governments pursue different, if not opposing policies. This puzzle not only challenges the traditional belief that scientific knowledge is objective and can be more or less directly translated into political action, but also calls for a better understanding of the relation between science and public policy in modern society. Based on the conceptual framework of knowledge politics the use of expert knowledge in public discourse and in political decisions will be analysed. This will be carried out through a country comparison between the United States and Germany. The main finding is that the press in both countries relies on different sources of scientific expertise when reporting on global warming. In a similar way, governments in both countries use these different sources for legitimising their contrasting policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249042282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1743-8934&volume=16&issue=3&spage=414

U2 - 10.1080/09644010701251656

DO - 10.1080/09644010701251656

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 414

EP - 432

JO - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 3

ER -