Clinical decision making for children with down syndrome and hearing loss

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

Abstract

Aims Otitis media with effusion (OME) and its associated hearing loss is prevalent in children with Down syndrome (DS) (Fortnum et al, 2014). There are a range of interventions available but they have associated risks and benefits specific to children with DS. Parents reported a perception of inconsistent care with interventions chosen based on clinician preference (Fortnum et al, 2014). This study aimed to examine how professionals make decisions about managing hearing loss in children with DS.

Methods This project used a grounded theory approach to explore decision making. A range of multi-disciplinary professionals who work with children with DS and hearing loss were purposively sampled. Interviews were conducted face to face or by phone with 10 professionals. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify decision making processes.

Results Themes were linked to a framework illustrating how the variation in clinician decision making occurred. Clinician preference was determined by individual attitude towards the patient and belief in treatment efficacy and availability. Attitude was associated with professional role and scope of practice. Contextual factors relating to local service delivery influenced the interventions offered to parents. Multi-disciplinary relationships were described to be important but often felt to be unsatisfactory and in some cases hindered decision making. Hearing aids were perceived by some clinicians as a burden to parents, particularly when a child also had a visual impairment.

Conclusions There is variation in response to OME and hearing loss across the professional groups involved with the child. There is scope for improving shared decision making between clinicians and parents when making decisions about managing hearing loss.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberG367
Pages (from-to)A215
Number of pages1
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood
Volume101
Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2016
EventRoyal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Annual Conference 2016 - Liverpool, United Kingdom
Duration: 26 Apr 201628 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Down Syndrome
Hearing Loss
Decision Making
Parents
Otitis Media with Effusion
Professional Role
Hearing Aids
Vision Disorders
Clinical Decision-Making
Interviews

Cite this

@article{c925581491234d4c9b47d6e17adb2ed0,
title = "Clinical decision making for children with down syndrome and hearing loss",
abstract = "Aims Otitis media with effusion (OME) and its associated hearing loss is prevalent in children with Down syndrome (DS) (Fortnum et al, 2014). There are a range of interventions available but they have associated risks and benefits specific to children with DS. Parents reported a perception of inconsistent care with interventions chosen based on clinician preference (Fortnum et al, 2014). This study aimed to examine how professionals make decisions about managing hearing loss in children with DS.Methods This project used a grounded theory approach to explore decision making. A range of multi-disciplinary professionals who work with children with DS and hearing loss were purposively sampled. Interviews were conducted face to face or by phone with 10 professionals. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify decision making processes.Results Themes were linked to a framework illustrating how the variation in clinician decision making occurred. Clinician preference was determined by individual attitude towards the patient and belief in treatment efficacy and availability. Attitude was associated with professional role and scope of practice. Contextual factors relating to local service delivery influenced the interventions offered to parents. Multi-disciplinary relationships were described to be important but often felt to be unsatisfactory and in some cases hindered decision making. Hearing aids were perceived by some clinicians as a burden to parents, particularly when a child also had a visual impairment.Conclusions There is variation in response to OME and hearing loss across the professional groups involved with the child. There is scope for improving shared decision making between clinicians and parents when making decisions about managing hearing loss.",
author = "Amanda Hall and Helen Pryce",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "27",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "A215",
journal = "Archives of Disease in Childhood",
issn = "0003-9888",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

Clinical decision making for children with down syndrome and hearing loss. / Hall, Amanda; Pryce , Helen.

In: Archives of Disease in Childhood, Vol. 101, G367, 27.04.2016, p. A215.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical decision making for children with down syndrome and hearing loss

AU - Hall, Amanda

AU - Pryce , Helen

PY - 2016/4/27

Y1 - 2016/4/27

N2 - Aims Otitis media with effusion (OME) and its associated hearing loss is prevalent in children with Down syndrome (DS) (Fortnum et al, 2014). There are a range of interventions available but they have associated risks and benefits specific to children with DS. Parents reported a perception of inconsistent care with interventions chosen based on clinician preference (Fortnum et al, 2014). This study aimed to examine how professionals make decisions about managing hearing loss in children with DS.Methods This project used a grounded theory approach to explore decision making. A range of multi-disciplinary professionals who work with children with DS and hearing loss were purposively sampled. Interviews were conducted face to face or by phone with 10 professionals. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify decision making processes.Results Themes were linked to a framework illustrating how the variation in clinician decision making occurred. Clinician preference was determined by individual attitude towards the patient and belief in treatment efficacy and availability. Attitude was associated with professional role and scope of practice. Contextual factors relating to local service delivery influenced the interventions offered to parents. Multi-disciplinary relationships were described to be important but often felt to be unsatisfactory and in some cases hindered decision making. Hearing aids were perceived by some clinicians as a burden to parents, particularly when a child also had a visual impairment.Conclusions There is variation in response to OME and hearing loss across the professional groups involved with the child. There is scope for improving shared decision making between clinicians and parents when making decisions about managing hearing loss.

AB - Aims Otitis media with effusion (OME) and its associated hearing loss is prevalent in children with Down syndrome (DS) (Fortnum et al, 2014). There are a range of interventions available but they have associated risks and benefits specific to children with DS. Parents reported a perception of inconsistent care with interventions chosen based on clinician preference (Fortnum et al, 2014). This study aimed to examine how professionals make decisions about managing hearing loss in children with DS.Methods This project used a grounded theory approach to explore decision making. A range of multi-disciplinary professionals who work with children with DS and hearing loss were purposively sampled. Interviews were conducted face to face or by phone with 10 professionals. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify decision making processes.Results Themes were linked to a framework illustrating how the variation in clinician decision making occurred. Clinician preference was determined by individual attitude towards the patient and belief in treatment efficacy and availability. Attitude was associated with professional role and scope of practice. Contextual factors relating to local service delivery influenced the interventions offered to parents. Multi-disciplinary relationships were described to be important but often felt to be unsatisfactory and in some cases hindered decision making. Hearing aids were perceived by some clinicians as a burden to parents, particularly when a child also had a visual impairment.Conclusions There is variation in response to OME and hearing loss across the professional groups involved with the child. There is scope for improving shared decision making between clinicians and parents when making decisions about managing hearing loss.

UR - http://adc.bmj.com/content/101/Suppl_1/A215.1.info

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 101

SP - A215

JO - Archives of Disease in Childhood

JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood

SN - 0003-9888

M1 - G367

ER -