Abstract
Purpose: This study examines how accountability is co-produced between NGOs and the beneficiaries, where beneficiaries assume roles as objects and subjects of accountability accounts.
Design/methodology/approach: The study employs a multiple-units case study approach and draws empirical insights from programmes run by a major Indonesian NGO. Data were collected through interviews, document analysis and observations. Relevant aspects of stakeholder-centric stakeholder theory were used to frame the analysis.
Findings: Shaped by power dynamics, the NGO accountability framework seeks to quantify its work and actively structures beneficiary participation, positioning beneficiaries as objects. The findings reveal that beneficiaries are, however, not merely passive recipients but active subjects striving to assert their agency as they navigate the constraints and opportunities within these structured spaces. Through their participation – whether through compliance, adaptation or subtle negotiation – they contribute to the co-production of accountability accounts, demonstrating that even within controlled frameworks, accountability remains a relational process.
Originality/value: The study contributes to NGO accountability literature by foregrounding grassroots participation and highlighting how structurally constrained beneficiaries shape and co-produce NGO accountability, offering an alternative to the prevailing top-down accountability framework. It also extends the dialogic accountability literature by showing that beneficiary participation, in the presence of power asymmetries, often unfolds subtly and adaptively, prioritising access to the programme's benefit over direct contestation of the NGO's agenda.
Design/methodology/approach: The study employs a multiple-units case study approach and draws empirical insights from programmes run by a major Indonesian NGO. Data were collected through interviews, document analysis and observations. Relevant aspects of stakeholder-centric stakeholder theory were used to frame the analysis.
Findings: Shaped by power dynamics, the NGO accountability framework seeks to quantify its work and actively structures beneficiary participation, positioning beneficiaries as objects. The findings reveal that beneficiaries are, however, not merely passive recipients but active subjects striving to assert their agency as they navigate the constraints and opportunities within these structured spaces. Through their participation – whether through compliance, adaptation or subtle negotiation – they contribute to the co-production of accountability accounts, demonstrating that even within controlled frameworks, accountability remains a relational process.
Originality/value: The study contributes to NGO accountability literature by foregrounding grassroots participation and highlighting how structurally constrained beneficiaries shape and co-produce NGO accountability, offering an alternative to the prevailing top-down accountability framework. It also extends the dialogic accountability literature by showing that beneficiary participation, in the presence of power asymmetries, often unfolds subtly and adaptively, prioritising access to the programme's benefit over direct contestation of the NGO's agenda.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal |
| Early online date | 9 Apr 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Apr 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2026 Emerald Publishing. This AAM is deposited under the CC BY-NC 4.0 licence. Any reuse is allowed in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence. To reuse the AAM for commercial purposes, permission should be sought by contacting [email protected]Keywords
- Accountability
- Beneficiary participation
- Co-production
- Non-governmental organisation
- Performance measurement
- Stakeholder theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Co-producing NGO accountability accounts with beneficiaries: evidence from Indonesia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver