TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative evaluation of engineering design concepts based on non-linear substructuring analysis
AU - Kajtaz, Mladenko
AU - Subic, Aleksandar
AU - Takla, Monir
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The paper presents a novel approach to comparative evaluation of engineering design concepts that exhibit non-linear structural behaviour under load. The developed method has extended the substructures technique in order to apply the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method to complex non-linear structural problems in the conceptual design phase. As conventional FE models based on substructures allow only linear analysis, it was necessary in this research to introduce a new algorithm capable of linearizing non-linear structural problems with sufficient accuracy in order to enable comparative evaluation of design concepts relative to each other under the given constraints and loading conditions. A comparative study with respect to model size, efficiency, accuracy and confidence was performed to validate the developed method. Obtained results indicate significant improvement over more traditional approaches to applying FEA in the conceptual design phase. The improvements achieved using the developed method compared to the traditional FE based approach are superior by a factor of 2.7 in efficiency and by a factor of 4.5 in confidence while not sacrificing the optimality of the solutions.
AB - The paper presents a novel approach to comparative evaluation of engineering design concepts that exhibit non-linear structural behaviour under load. The developed method has extended the substructures technique in order to apply the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method to complex non-linear structural problems in the conceptual design phase. As conventional FE models based on substructures allow only linear analysis, it was necessary in this research to introduce a new algorithm capable of linearizing non-linear structural problems with sufficient accuracy in order to enable comparative evaluation of design concepts relative to each other under the given constraints and loading conditions. A comparative study with respect to model size, efficiency, accuracy and confidence was performed to validate the developed method. Obtained results indicate significant improvement over more traditional approaches to applying FEA in the conceptual design phase. The improvements achieved using the developed method compared to the traditional FE based approach are superior by a factor of 2.7 in efficiency and by a factor of 4.5 in confidence while not sacrificing the optimality of the solutions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84873029182&doi=10.4028%2fwww.scientific.net%2fAMR.633.15&origin=inward&txGid=5a97bb897009d8caca486052964cdcc6
UR - https://www.scientific.net/AMR.633.15
U2 - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.15
DO - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.15
M3 - Article
SN - 1022-6680
VL - 633
SP - 15
EP - 35
JO - Advanced Materials Research
JF - Advanced Materials Research
ER -