Comparative evaluation of engineering design concepts based on non-linear substructuring analysis

Mladenko Kajtaz, Aleksandar Subic, Monir Takla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The paper presents a novel approach to comparative evaluation of engineering design concepts that exhibit non-linear structural behaviour under load. The developed method has extended the substructures technique in order to apply the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method to complex non-linear structural problems in the conceptual design phase. As conventional FE models based on substructures allow only linear analysis, it was necessary in this research to introduce a new algorithm capable of linearizing non-linear structural problems with sufficient accuracy in order to enable comparative evaluation of design concepts relative to each other under the given constraints and loading conditions. A comparative study with respect to model size, efficiency, accuracy and confidence was performed to validate the developed method. Obtained results indicate significant improvement over more traditional approaches to applying FEA in the conceptual design phase. The improvements achieved using the developed method compared to the traditional FE based approach are superior by a factor of 2.7 in efficiency and by a factor of 4.5 in confidence while not sacrificing the optimality of the solutions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-35
Number of pages21
JournalAdvanced Materials Research
Volume633
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative evaluation of engineering design concepts based on non-linear substructuring analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this