Comparative study of the effects of reactor system and catalysts on glycerol valorisation via aqueous-phase reforming

Carine T. Alves, Francisco Maldonado-Martín, Alejandro Lete, Seyed Emad Hashemnezhad, Lucía García*, Jude A. Onwudili

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The conversion of glycerol through aqueous phase reforming (APR) presents an important opportunity for sustainable chemical and fuel production. This study explores the APR of glycerol using three catalysts (nickel supported on alumina (NiAl), copper supported on alumina (CuAl), and bimetallic nickel-iron supported on alumina (NiAlFe)), synthesised via the coprecipitation method. The APR experiments were conducted in both batch and fixed-bed reactors. In the batch reactor, a 75 mL Parr reactor was utilised, operating at 238 °C and 5 bar initial nitrogen pressure with 20 mL of a 5 wt% glycerol solution and 0.3 g of catalyst (catalyst/glycerol mass ratio = 0.3). The fixed-bed reactor was made of a stainless steel tube loaded with 2 g of catalyst, operating at 238 °C and 37 bar, with a continuous feed of 5 wt% glycerol solution, equivalent to catalyst/glycerol mass ratio of 0.33. NiAl produced the highest conversion of glycerol to gases and the highest yield of hydrogen (230 mg H2/mol C fed). However, among the tested catalysts, NiAlFe demonstrated superior performance, achieving a carbon yield to total products (liquid and gases) of approximately 80% in the batch reactor as well as a relatively high hydrogen yield (141 mg H2/mol C fed). These results underscore the promising potential of the NiAlFe catalyst for efficient glycerol conversion in APR processes, paving the way for advancements in sustainable fuel and chemical production.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102447
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Energy Institute
Volume125
Early online date10 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Energy Institute. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Funding

This work was supported by the EU Horizon Marie Curie Fellowship, Grant Number 892998 for C.T.A. and J.A.O. The authors (F.M-M., A.L. and L.G.) gratefully acknowledge financial support from Grants PID2020-114985RBI00 (funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033) and PID2024-160640OB-I00 (funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF/EU). Grant PRE2021-100578 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and ESF+ awarded to F.M-M. Additional funding from the Government of Arag´on through Research Group T22_23 R is also duly recognized.

Keywords

  • Glycerol
  • Heterogeneous catalysis
  • Aqueous phase reforming
  • Hydrogen
  • Batch reactor
  • Fixed-bed reactors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study of the effects of reactor system and catalysts on glycerol valorisation via aqueous-phase reforming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this