Comparing different approach and avoidance models of learning and personality in the prediction of work, university, and leadership outcomes

Chris J. Jackson, Elizabeth V. Hobman, Nerina L. Jimmieson, Robin Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Jackson (2005) developed a hybrid model of personality and learning, known as the learning styles profiler (LSP) which was designed to span biological, socio-cognitive, and experiential research foci of personality and learning research. The hybrid model argues that functional and dysfunctional learning outcomes can be best understood in terms of how cognitions and experiences control, discipline, and re-express the biologically based scale of sensation-seeking. In two studies with part-time workers undertaking tertiary education (N=137 and 58), established models of approach and avoidance from each of the three different research foci were compared with Jackson's hybrid model in their predictiveness of leadership, work, and university outcomes using self-report and supervisor ratings. Results showed that the hybrid model was generally optimal and, as hypothesized, that goal orientation was a mediator of sensation-seeking on outcomes (work performance, university performance, leader behaviours, and counterproductive work behaviour). Our studies suggest that the hybrid model has considerable promise as a predictor of work and educational outcomes as well as dysfunctional outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-312
Number of pages30
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Avoidance Learning
Personality
Learning
Research
Self Report
Cognition
Education
Avoidance
Prediction
Hybrid Model

Keywords

  • hybrid model
  • personality and learning
  • learning styles profiler
  • LSP
  • personality and learning research
  • functional learning
  • outcomes
  • dysfunctional learning

Cite this

Jackson, Chris J. ; Hobman, Elizabeth V. ; Jimmieson, Nerina L. ; Martin, Robin. / Comparing different approach and avoidance models of learning and personality in the prediction of work, university, and leadership outcomes. In: British Journal of Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 100, No. 2. pp. 283-312.
@article{aff8ad8d25514f969b9cbfdde6aaa738,
title = "Comparing different approach and avoidance models of learning and personality in the prediction of work, university, and leadership outcomes",
abstract = "Jackson (2005) developed a hybrid model of personality and learning, known as the learning styles profiler (LSP) which was designed to span biological, socio-cognitive, and experiential research foci of personality and learning research. The hybrid model argues that functional and dysfunctional learning outcomes can be best understood in terms of how cognitions and experiences control, discipline, and re-express the biologically based scale of sensation-seeking. In two studies with part-time workers undertaking tertiary education (N=137 and 58), established models of approach and avoidance from each of the three different research foci were compared with Jackson's hybrid model in their predictiveness of leadership, work, and university outcomes using self-report and supervisor ratings. Results showed that the hybrid model was generally optimal and, as hypothesized, that goal orientation was a mediator of sensation-seeking on outcomes (work performance, university performance, leader behaviours, and counterproductive work behaviour). Our studies suggest that the hybrid model has considerable promise as a predictor of work and educational outcomes as well as dysfunctional outcomes.",
keywords = "hybrid model, personality and learning, learning styles profiler, LSP, personality and learning research, functional learning, outcomes, dysfunctional learning",
author = "Jackson, {Chris J.} and Hobman, {Elizabeth V.} and Jimmieson, {Nerina L.} and Robin Martin",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1348/000712608X322900",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "283--312",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Comparing different approach and avoidance models of learning and personality in the prediction of work, university, and leadership outcomes. / Jackson, Chris J.; Hobman, Elizabeth V.; Jimmieson, Nerina L.; Martin, Robin.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 100, No. 2, 05.2009, p. 283-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing different approach and avoidance models of learning and personality in the prediction of work, university, and leadership outcomes

AU - Jackson, Chris J.

AU - Hobman, Elizabeth V.

AU - Jimmieson, Nerina L.

AU - Martin, Robin

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Jackson (2005) developed a hybrid model of personality and learning, known as the learning styles profiler (LSP) which was designed to span biological, socio-cognitive, and experiential research foci of personality and learning research. The hybrid model argues that functional and dysfunctional learning outcomes can be best understood in terms of how cognitions and experiences control, discipline, and re-express the biologically based scale of sensation-seeking. In two studies with part-time workers undertaking tertiary education (N=137 and 58), established models of approach and avoidance from each of the three different research foci were compared with Jackson's hybrid model in their predictiveness of leadership, work, and university outcomes using self-report and supervisor ratings. Results showed that the hybrid model was generally optimal and, as hypothesized, that goal orientation was a mediator of sensation-seeking on outcomes (work performance, university performance, leader behaviours, and counterproductive work behaviour). Our studies suggest that the hybrid model has considerable promise as a predictor of work and educational outcomes as well as dysfunctional outcomes.

AB - Jackson (2005) developed a hybrid model of personality and learning, known as the learning styles profiler (LSP) which was designed to span biological, socio-cognitive, and experiential research foci of personality and learning research. The hybrid model argues that functional and dysfunctional learning outcomes can be best understood in terms of how cognitions and experiences control, discipline, and re-express the biologically based scale of sensation-seeking. In two studies with part-time workers undertaking tertiary education (N=137 and 58), established models of approach and avoidance from each of the three different research foci were compared with Jackson's hybrid model in their predictiveness of leadership, work, and university outcomes using self-report and supervisor ratings. Results showed that the hybrid model was generally optimal and, as hypothesized, that goal orientation was a mediator of sensation-seeking on outcomes (work performance, university performance, leader behaviours, and counterproductive work behaviour). Our studies suggest that the hybrid model has considerable promise as a predictor of work and educational outcomes as well as dysfunctional outcomes.

KW - hybrid model

KW - personality and learning

KW - learning styles profiler

KW - LSP

KW - personality and learning research

KW - functional learning

KW - outcomes

KW - dysfunctional learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68749095134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1348/000712608X322900/abstract

U2 - 10.1348/000712608X322900

DO - 10.1348/000712608X322900

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 283

EP - 312

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 2

ER -