Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the thatcher illusion

Luc Boutsen*, Glyn W. Humphreys, Peter Praamstra, Tracy Warbrick

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the Thatcher illusion, a face with inverted eyes and mouth looks abnormal when upright but not when inverted. Behavioral studies have shown that thatcherization of an upright face disrupts perceptual processing of the local configuration. We recorded high-density EEG from normal observers to study ERP correlates of the illusion during the perception of faces and nonface objects, to determine whether inversion and thatcherization affect similar neural mechanisms. Observers viewed faces and houses in four conditions (upright vs. inverted, and normal vs. thatcherized) while detecting an oddball category (chairs). Thatcherization delayed the N170 component over occipito-temporal cortex to faces, but not to houses. This modulation matched the illusion as it was larger for upright than inverted faces. The P1 over medial occipital regions was delayed by face inversion but unaffected by thatcherization. Finally, face thatcherization delayed P2 over occipito-temporal but not over parietal regions, while inversion affected P2 across categories. All effects involving thatcherization were face-specific. These results indicate that effects of face inversion and feature inversion (in thatcherized faces) can be distinguished on a functional as well as neural level, and that they affect configural processing of faces in different time windows. © 2006 Elsevier Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)352-367
Number of pages16
JournalNeuroimage
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006

Keywords

  • Thatcher illusion
  • behavioral studies
  • perceptual processing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the thatcher illusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this