Abstract
Background: To compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in eyes 1 year following penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with that of normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyser.Methods: Prospective case comparison of 166 normal right eyes and 34 unilateral post-PK eyes presenting to a teaching hospital in Birmingham, UK. The CH, CRF and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure, of each eye was measured using the Ocular Response Analyser. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter.Results: The mean CH was 10.6 ±2.0 mmHg, standard deviation (SD) and CRF was 10.2 ± 2.0 mmHg (SD) in normal eyes and 8.9 ± 3.3 mmHg and 8.1 ± 3.3 mmHg in post-PK eyes, respectively. The mean CCT was 541.8 ± 36.1 μm in normal eyes and 556.0 ±69.2 μm in post-PK eyes. The Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure was 16.1 ± 3.1 mmHg and 12.4 ± 2.9 mmHg in normal eyes and post-PK eyes, respectively. The CCT was found to be higher in post-PK eyes compared with normal eyes but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.5).Conclusion: Reduced biomechanical measures were found in post-PK eyes despite a higher mean CCT. This may be due to the altered corneal structure following PK.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 758-763 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2010 |
Keywords
- corneal resistance factor
- hysteresis
- penetrating keratoplasty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of biomechanical parameters in penetrating keratoplasty and normal eyes using the Ocular Response Analyser'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver