Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser

Sunil Shah*, Mohammed Laiquzzaman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To compare biomechanical parameters measured by the Ocular Response Analyser (ORA) in the form of corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes. Setting: Teaching Hospital and private eye clinic in Solihull, UK. Methods: Prospective case comparison of 110 eyes selected for refractive surgery and 132 keratoconic eyes. The CH and CRF of each eye was measured by the ORA. The CCT was measured using ultrasonic pachymetry. Results: The mean preoperative (pre-op) CH for the normal refractive surgery eyes was 11.4 ± 1.9 mmHg, CRF 10.0 ± 1.6 mmHg and CCT 546.5 ± 33.0 μm. Post-operatively CH was 9.2 ± 2.1 mmHg, CRF 7.6 ± 1.8 mmHg and CCT 483.1 ± 40.8 μm. The values for keratoconic eyes were 9.4 ± 2.2 mmHg, 7.7 ± 2.6 mmHg and 488.1 ± 52.6 μm, respectively. The CH, CRF and CCT decreased as the severity of keratoconic eyes increased. All these parameters showed statistically significant difference between normal eyes and keratoconic eyes. This was also the case between post-operative eyes. Conclusion: The biomechanical parameters measured were very similar when comparing keratoconic and post-refractive surgery eyes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-132
Number of pages4
JournalContact Lens and Anterior Eye
Volume32
Issue number3
Early online date23 Feb 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Keywords

  • corneal resistance factor
  • hysteresis
  • keratoconus
  • LASIK/LASEK

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this